Development of an artificial intelligence competency scale for early childhood educators (ACES)

This study aims to develop an AI competency scale for Early Childhood Education (ECE) teachers and to conduct its validity and reliability analyses. In the study, the deductive method was used to develop a scale. The sample consisted of 508 ECE teachers. A 31-item draft form was created based on a literature review and expert opinions. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Cronbach’s Alpha reliability analysis were conducted for validity and reliability. Item-total test correlations, item discrimination power for the lowest and highest 27% groups, convergent validity, content validity, discriminant validity, and test-retest reliability were examined. As a result of validity and reliability analyses, 6 items were removed from the scale. The findings supported a 25-item, four-factor structure of the ACES scale, including AI Knowledge, AI Skills, Attitude towards AI, and Ethics in AI Usage. This structure explains 77.03% of the variance. The Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency coefficients were calculated as 0.91 for AI Knowledge, 0.94 for AI Skills, 0.92 for Attitude towards AI, 0.84 for Ethics in AI Usage, and 0.93 for the scale overall. The findings provide initial psychometric evidence for the self-report-based ACES scale as a tool for assessing ECE educators’ perceived AI competencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07838-0
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of an artificial intelligence competency scale for early childhood educators (ACES)

Osman Tayyar Çelik, Cihangir Kaçmaz
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Teaching and Learning Programming
article

Development of an artificial intelligence competency scale for early childhood educators (ACES)

Osman Tayyar Çelik, Cihangir Kaçmaz
article en

Abstract

This study aims to develop an AI competency scale for Early Childhood Education (ECE) teachers and to conduct its validity and reliability analyses. In the study, the deductive method was used to develop a scale. The sample consisted of 508 ECE teachers. A 31-item draft form was created based on a literature review and expert opinions. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Cronbach’s Alpha reliability analysis were conducted for validity and reliability. Item-total test correlations, item discrimination power for the lowest and highest 27% groups, convergent validity, content validity, discriminant validity, and test-retest reliability were examined. As a result of validity and reliability analyses, 6 items were removed from the scale. The findings supported a 25-item, four-factor structure of the ACES scale, including AI Knowledge, AI Skills, Attitude towards AI, and Ethics in AI Usage. This structure explains 77.03% of the variance. The Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency coefficients were calculated as 0.91 for AI Knowledge, 0.94 for AI Skills, 0.92 for Attitude towards AI, 0.84 for Ethics in AI Usage, and 0.93 for the scale overall. The findings provide initial psychometric evidence for the self-report-based ACES scale as a tool for assessing ECE educators’ perceived AI competencies.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Inonu University (TR), Kayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.