Enhancing Grass and Maize Silage: Role of Silage Additives and Environmental Implications for Biogas Production

Silage additives enhance forage preservation and resource efficiency by reducing dry matter (DM) losses and limiting aerobic spoilage. This study evaluated crop-specific lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculants by comparing treated (T) silage with untreated (U) controls for maize and grass. Silage quality was assessed using nutritional, fermentation, and microbial indicators, alongside aerobic stability (ASTA) and biogas yield. Additionally, a carbon footprint (CF) assessment, based on primary data from a farm in northern Germany with background datasets, quantified the implications for the biogas-to-electricity pathway. Two scenarios were modelled, with Scenario II accounting for changes in soil organic carbon (SOC). LAB additives improved preservation, with DM losses decreased from 18.48% in untreated grass (UG) to 13.17% in treated grass (TG) and from 21.53% in untreated maize (UM) to 5.21% in treated maize (TM). ASTA increased to 223 h for TM and 218 h for TG, alongside a lower presence of yeasts and moulds. In Scenario I, CF decreased by 5.00% for TG (293.53 g CO2-eq kWhel−1) and 6.89% for TM (229.05 g CO2-eq kWhel−1). Under Scenario II (including SOC), TG showed a value of 135.43 g CO2-eq kWhel−1, and TM 321.48 g CO2-eq kWhel−1. Overall, the additive improved silage stability and reduced climate impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16131451
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Grass and Maize Silage: Role of Silage Additives and Environmental Implications for Biogas Production

Jan Sprafke, Ewald Kramer, Johanna Witt, Alberto Bezama et al.
Agriculture
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Enhancing Grass and Maize Silage: Role of Silage Additives and Environmental Implications for Biogas Production

Jan Sprafke, Ewald Kramer, Johanna Witt, Alberto Bezama, Cinthya Lara Verdezoto, Michael Nelles
article en

Abstract

Silage additives enhance forage preservation and resource efficiency by reducing dry matter (DM) losses and limiting aerobic spoilage. This study evaluated crop-specific lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculants by comparing treated (T) silage with untreated (U) controls for maize and grass. Silage quality was assessed using nutritional, fermentation, and microbial indicators, alongside aerobic stability (ASTA) and biogas yield. Additionally, a carbon footprint (CF) assessment, based on primary data from a farm in northern Germany with background datasets, quantified the implications for the biogas-to-electricity pathway. Two scenarios were modelled, with Scenario II accounting for changes in soil organic carbon (SOC). LAB additives improved preservation, with DM losses decreased from 18.48% in untreated grass (UG) to 13.17% in treated grass (TG) and from 21.53% in untreated maize (UM) to 5.21% in treated maize (TM). ASTA increased to 223 h for TM and 218 h for TG, alongside a lower presence of yeasts and moulds. In Scenario I, CF decreased by 5.00% for TG (293.53 g CO2-eq kWhel−1) and 6.89% for TM (229.05 g CO2-eq kWhel−1). Under Scenario II (including SOC), TG showed a value of 135.43 g CO2-eq kWhel−1, and TM 321.48 g CO2-eq kWhel−1. Overall, the additive improved silage stability and reduced climate impacts.

AgricultureVol. 16(13)
Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (DE), University of Calgary (CA), Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DE), University of Rostock (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.