Longitudinal Psychosocial and Sleep Assessments for Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk Stratification After First Myocardial Infarction in Rural India

OBJECTIVES: The risk of myocardial infarction (MI) evolves beyond the acute phase, and in-hospital tools, such as the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, may not fully capture long-term vulnerability. We evaluated whether simple longitudinal clinical and patient-reported measures improved the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 351 patients with first MI were enrolled at a rural tertiary center in South India, of whom 319 formed the analytic cohort. MACE was defined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, or urgent coronary revascularization, as ascertained through hospital records and structured follow-up. Baseline clinical, biochemical, echocardiographic, and interviewer-administered psychosocial (PHQ-9 and GAD-7) and sleep variables were collected during hospitalization and follow-up (1, 6, and 12 months). Cox models were developed in stages, with the GRACE score as a baseline anchor and follow-up variables incorporated using the last available observations. Model performance was assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C-index), time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), and bootstrap validation methods. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 94 patients (29.5%) experienced MACE. The baseline model modestly improved discrimination over GRACE alone (C-index, 0.622 vs. 0.556). The extended model showed higher discrimination (apparent C-index 0.684; optimism-corrected 0.660). Follow-up sleep quality, psychosocial symptoms, glycemic measures, and global longitudinal strain contributed to the model, although the estimates were imprecise. CONCLUSION: Longitudinal follow-up measures provided modest incremental prognostic information beyond a GRACE-based benchmark. Findings are exploratory and require external validation before clinical application.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Principles and Practice
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000553362
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal Psychosocial and Sleep Assessments for Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk Stratification After First Myocardial Infarction in Rural India

Sai Sathish Ramamurthy, Gautam Rege, Nisha Haloi, Bhargava Sai Mukkirla et al.
Medical Principles and Practice
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Longitudinal Psychosocial and Sleep Assessments for Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk Stratification After First Myocardial Infarction in Rural India

Sai Sathish Ramamurthy, Gautam Rege, Nisha Haloi, Bhargava Sai Mukkirla, Bebeto Rai, Naga Sai Visweswar Kambhampati, Sai Kiran Javvaji, Ganesh Kalathur Mohan, V. Ramnath Iyer, Debarshi Dey, Malleswara D
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The risk of myocardial infarction (MI) evolves beyond the acute phase, and in-hospital tools, such as the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, may not fully capture long-term vulnerability. We evaluated whether simple longitudinal clinical and patient-reported measures improved the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 351 patients with first MI were enrolled at a rural tertiary center in South India, of whom 319 formed the analytic cohort. MACE was defined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, or urgent coronary revascularization, as ascertained through hospital records and structured follow-up. Baseline clinical, biochemical, echocardiographic, and interviewer-administered psychosocial (PHQ-9 and GAD-7) and sleep variables were collected during hospitalization and follow-up (1, 6, and 12 months). Cox models were developed in stages, with the GRACE score as a baseline anchor and follow-up variables incorporated using the last available observations. Model performance was assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C-index), time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), and bootstrap validation methods. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 94 patients (29.5%) experienced MACE. The baseline model modestly improved discrimination over GRACE alone (C-index, 0.622 vs. 0.556). The extended model showed higher discrimination (apparent C-index 0.684; optimism-corrected 0.660). Follow-up sleep quality, psychosocial symptoms, glycemic measures, and global longitudinal strain contributed to the model, although the estimates were imprecise. CONCLUSION: Longitudinal follow-up measures provided modest incremental prognostic information beyond a GRACE-based benchmark. Findings are exploratory and require external validation before clinical application.

Medical Principles and Practice
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.