From path dependence to path creation: How China's incumbent power generators navigate the energy transition?

Beyond dichotomous views of resistance and support, the roles of incumbents in sustainability transitions are increasingly recognized as multidimensional, heterogeneous, and temporally dynamic. However, longitudinal empirical analysis remains limited regarding how such roles are reconfigured across transition phases into differentiated firm-level pathways, especially for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in state-led transitions. China's power generation sector offers an instructive case. It combines partial power market reform with strong state direction, placing incumbent SOEs under hybrid objectives of commercial performance and public service delivery, including expanding renewables while maintaining reliable supply. Based on 19 semi-structured interviews and secondary materials, this study conducts a longitudinal qualitative case study of China's “Big Five” power generation SOEs from 2002 to 2024, using an enriched Triple Embeddedness Framework (TEF). Five system-level transition phases are identified: predevelopment (2002–2005), take-off (2006–2010), acceleration (2011–2014), reconfiguration (2015–2019), and re-alignment (2020–2024). The findings show that transition pressures evolved non-linearly as decarbonization was repeatedly recalibrated against energy security, affordability, and economic growth. In response, the Big Five exhibited phase-dependent patterns of legitimacy-oriented convergence and capability-based divergence. Their long-term trajectories are conceptualized as five ideal-typical pathways, namely system-stabilizing expansion, public-service anchoring, system integration, low-carbon frontrunning, and market-interface innovation. The study contributes a temporally sensitive account of incumbency in state-led energy transitions and extends the TEF to a coupled state-market setting, with implications for energy transitions in emerging and developing economies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104818
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From path dependence to path creation: How China's incumbent power generators navigate the energy transition?

Sixuan Liu, Xiao Wang, Jing Wu
Energy Research & Social Science
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

From path dependence to path creation: How China's incumbent power generators navigate the energy transition?

Sixuan Liu, Xiao Wang, Jing Wu
article en

Abstract

Beyond dichotomous views of resistance and support, the roles of incumbents in sustainability transitions are increasingly recognized as multidimensional, heterogeneous, and temporally dynamic. However, longitudinal empirical analysis remains limited regarding how such roles are reconfigured across transition phases into differentiated firm-level pathways, especially for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in state-led transitions. China's power generation sector offers an instructive case. It combines partial power market reform with strong state direction, placing incumbent SOEs under hybrid objectives of commercial performance and public service delivery, including expanding renewables while maintaining reliable supply. Based on 19 semi-structured interviews and secondary materials, this study conducts a longitudinal qualitative case study of China's “Big Five” power generation SOEs from 2002 to 2024, using an enriched Triple Embeddedness Framework (TEF). Five system-level transition phases are identified: predevelopment (2002–2005), take-off (2006–2010), acceleration (2011–2014), reconfiguration (2015–2019), and re-alignment (2020–2024). The findings show that transition pressures evolved non-linearly as decarbonization was repeatedly recalibrated against energy security, affordability, and economic growth. In response, the Big Five exhibited phase-dependent patterns of legitimacy-oriented convergence and capability-based divergence. Their long-term trajectories are conceptualized as five ideal-typical pathways, namely system-stabilizing expansion, public-service anchoring, system integration, low-carbon frontrunning, and market-interface innovation. The study contributes a temporally sensitive account of incumbency in state-led energy transitions and extends the TEF to a coupled state-market setting, with implications for energy transitions in emerging and developing economies.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 138
Australian National University (AU), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.