Long-term forest understory recovery and tradeoffs in response to prescribed fire return interval

Abstract Background Prescribed fire is a critical tool for managers of dry fire-prone forests used to create more fire resilient forests, improve wildlife habitat and increase understory diversity. However, there are still knowledge gaps around how to apply fire to achieve and balance desired conditions, such as how the forest understory responds to frequency of burning. We leveraged a unique long-term prescribed burn experiment and evaluated the responses of different understory vegetation components to differing fire return intervals (5-, 10-, 20-year) including two common shrub species of interest in western forests, antelope bitterbrush (bitterbrush) and snowbrush ceanothus (snowbrush). Results Five- and 10-year burn treatments suppressed bitterbrush cover throughout the study but after cessation of 5-year burning, cover rebounded substantially within a decade. Bitterbrush density demonstrated rapid recovery after burning later in the study and with 5-year burning. We found that all burn treatments increased snowbrush cover and density to some degree, although cover remained low with 5-year burning. In some areas, 10- and 20-year burning and associated substantial overstory loss catalyzed dominance of snowbrush. Burning increased total herbaceous cover and biomass, particularly for the latter part of the study and for longer fire return intervals. Richness was not impacted by the treatments. The positive herbaceous response was driven by the rhizomatous western brackenfern. Ordination results revealed differing plant communities in response to treatments, largely driven by the increase of snowbrush and western brackenfern. Conclusions Wildland fire managers often face substantial tradeoffs as they plan to use prescribed fire to restore dry forests. Burning at 5-year intervals was the most successful at reducing surface litter and shrub cover but came with tradeoffs by reducing wildlife habitat values. Longer intervals (10- and 20-year) can sustain some bitterbrush cover but can also lead to dominance of snowbrush and western brackenfern in some areas. Designs that consider a matrix of unburned areas and a range of fire return intervals may be more likely to succeed in striking a balance. Although long-term studies of this nature are challenging to conduct, they remain critical to our understanding of how management activities affect ecosystem recovery and meet outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Ecology
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-026-00532-1
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term forest understory recovery and tradeoffs in response to prescribed fire return interval

Maureen C. Kennedy, Becky K. Kerns, Susan Prichard, Gregg M. Riegel et al.
Fire Ecology
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Long-term forest understory recovery and tradeoffs in response to prescribed fire return interval

Maureen C. Kennedy, Becky K. Kerns, Susan Prichard, Gregg M. Riegel, Deborah G. Nemens, Nathan M. Wade, Danielle H. Berger, G. L. Williams, Claire M. Tortorelli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Prescribed fire is a critical tool for managers of dry fire-prone forests used to create more fire resilient forests, improve wildlife habitat and increase understory diversity. However, there are still knowledge gaps around how to apply fire to achieve and balance desired conditions, such as how the forest understory responds to frequency of burning. We leveraged a unique long-term prescribed burn experiment and evaluated the responses of different understory vegetation components to differing fire return intervals (5-, 10-, 20-year) including two common shrub species of interest in western forests, antelope bitterbrush (bitterbrush) and snowbrush ceanothus (snowbrush). Results Five- and 10-year burn treatments suppressed bitterbrush cover throughout the study but after cessation of 5-year burning, cover rebounded substantially within a decade. Bitterbrush density demonstrated rapid recovery after burning later in the study and with 5-year burning. We found that all burn treatments increased snowbrush cover and density to some degree, although cover remained low with 5-year burning. In some areas, 10- and 20-year burning and associated substantial overstory loss catalyzed dominance of snowbrush. Burning increased total herbaceous cover and biomass, particularly for the latter part of the study and for longer fire return intervals. Richness was not impacted by the treatments. The positive herbaceous response was driven by the rhizomatous western brackenfern. Ordination results revealed differing plant communities in response to treatments, largely driven by the increase of snowbrush and western brackenfern. Conclusions Wildland fire managers often face substantial tradeoffs as they plan to use prescribed fire to restore dry forests. Burning at 5-year intervals was the most successful at reducing surface litter and shrub cover but came with tradeoffs by reducing wildlife habitat values. Longer intervals (10- and 20-year) can sustain some bitterbrush cover but can also lead to dominance of snowbrush and western brackenfern in some areas. Designs that consider a matrix of unburned areas and a range of fire return intervals may be more likely to succeed in striking a balance. Although long-term studies of this nature are challenging to conduct, they remain critical to our understanding of how management activities affect ecosystem recovery and meet outcomes.

Fire Ecology
University of Minnesota (US), Oregon State University (US), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (US), University of Washington (US), Pacific Northwest Research Station (US), University of Washington Tacoma (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.