Philosophical foundation and Accounting Thought on Implementation of The Triple Bottom Line in Indonesia

Abstract : The Triple Bottom Line, introduced by Elkington in the mid-1990s, has achieved widespread institutional legitimacy, becoming embedded in corporate reporting standards, regulatory frameworks, and business school curricula globally. However, despite this proliferation of TBL rhetoric, corporate behavior has not substantively changed, particularly in emerging economies such as Indonesia. This study examines the philosophical foundations and accounting thought underlying the implementation of TBL in Indonesia, addressing the persistent gap between sustainability rhetoric and corporate practice. Employing qualitative content analysis within an interpretive paradigm, this library research synthesizes theoretical frameworks from stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, and institutional theory to understand how Indonesian corporations conceptualize and operationalize TBL dimensions—economic (profit), social (people), and environmental (planet). The analysis reveals that Indonesian TBL implementation is characterized by symbolic adoption driven by institutional pressures rather than substantive ethical commitment, reflecting organized hypocrisy in sustainability reporting. Philosophical examination through eudaimonic ethics and critical accounting perspectives demonstrates that authentic TBL implementation requires transcending instrumental rationality toward inclusive profitability notions that integrate stakeholder well-being. The study identifies five critical challenges: rhetoric-practice gaps, weak integration of philosophical ethics with accounting practice, insufficient digital transformation adoption, inadequate ethical governance frameworks, and power asymmetries in stakeholder engagement. Recommendations emphasize developing culturally-grounded sustainability accounting frameworks that synthesize Indonesian philosophical traditions—including Stewardship and Common Good principles rooted in Catholic Social Teaching—with international best practices, strengthening environmental management accounting capabilities, and fostering genuine stakeholder dialogue to enable transformative corporate sustainability in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21126609
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Philosophical foundation and Accounting Thought on Implementation of The Triple Bottom Line in Indonesia

Pagalung Gagaring, Habbe Abdul Hamid, Tjakrawala F.X. Kurniawan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Philosophical foundation and Accounting Thought on Implementation of The Triple Bottom Line in Indonesia

Pagalung Gagaring, Habbe Abdul Hamid, Tjakrawala F.X. Kurniawan
article en

Abstract

Abstract : The Triple Bottom Line, introduced by Elkington in the mid-1990s, has achieved widespread institutional legitimacy, becoming embedded in corporate reporting standards, regulatory frameworks, and business school curricula globally. However, despite this proliferation of TBL rhetoric, corporate behavior has not substantively changed, particularly in emerging economies such as Indonesia. This study examines the philosophical foundations and accounting thought underlying the implementation of TBL in Indonesia, addressing the persistent gap between sustainability rhetoric and corporate practice. Employing qualitative content analysis within an interpretive paradigm, this library research synthesizes theoretical frameworks from stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, and institutional theory to understand how Indonesian corporations conceptualize and operationalize TBL dimensions—economic (profit), social (people), and environmental (planet). The analysis reveals that Indonesian TBL implementation is characterized by symbolic adoption driven by institutional pressures rather than substantive ethical commitment, reflecting organized hypocrisy in sustainability reporting. Philosophical examination through eudaimonic ethics and critical accounting perspectives demonstrates that authentic TBL implementation requires transcending instrumental rationality toward inclusive profitability notions that integrate stakeholder well-being. The study identifies five critical challenges: rhetoric-practice gaps, weak integration of philosophical ethics with accounting practice, insufficient digital transformation adoption, inadequate ethical governance frameworks, and power asymmetries in stakeholder engagement. Recommendations emphasize developing culturally-grounded sustainability accounting frameworks that synthesize Indonesian philosophical traditions—including Stewardship and Common Good principles rooted in Catholic Social Teaching—with international best practices, strengthening environmental management accounting capabilities, and fostering genuine stakeholder dialogue to enable transformative corporate sustainability in Indonesia.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Hasanuddin University (ID)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.