CCP Competition, Margins, and Crowding in US Treasury Market

ABSTRACT This paper presents a dynamic equilibrium model of US Treasury clearing that endogenizes explicit, VaR‐based initial margins, EWMA volatility updates, variation‐margin feedback, cross‐margining, and crowding effects within CCP competition. We cast clearing as a three‐stage stochastic game: CCPs commit to fees, margin multipliers, cross‐margin discounts, and volatility‐decay parameters; members allocate DV01 exposures in each period subject to funding‐cost feedback from margin calls; and CCPs incur tail‐risk, covariance, concentration, and infrastructure penalties over time. In the symmetric competitive equilibrium, stronger cross‐margining discounts, dynamically calibrated skin‐in‐the‐game buffers, concentration surcharges, and conservative margin‐and‐volatility regimes all reduce the joint default probability. We benchmark against a single‐CCP monopoly and demonstrate that only under extreme crowding does a well‐capitalized monopoly dominate. Our comparative‐statics yield a comprehensive policy toolkit—transparent margin formulas, volatility‐decay standards, feedback‐cap mechanisms, cross‐margin interoperability, and real‐time crowding metrics—to guide resilient Treasury clearing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Futures Markets
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.70126
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CCP Competition, Margins, and Crowding in US Treasury Market

Jingrui Li
Journal of Futures Markets
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

CCP Competition, Margins, and Crowding in US Treasury Market

Jingrui Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper presents a dynamic equilibrium model of US Treasury clearing that endogenizes explicit, VaR‐based initial margins, EWMA volatility updates, variation‐margin feedback, cross‐margining, and crowding effects within CCP competition. We cast clearing as a three‐stage stochastic game: CCPs commit to fees, margin multipliers, cross‐margin discounts, and volatility‐decay parameters; members allocate DV01 exposures in each period subject to funding‐cost feedback from margin calls; and CCPs incur tail‐risk, covariance, concentration, and infrastructure penalties over time. In the symmetric competitive equilibrium, stronger cross‐margining discounts, dynamically calibrated skin‐in‐the‐game buffers, concentration surcharges, and conservative margin‐and‐volatility regimes all reduce the joint default probability. We benchmark against a single‐CCP monopoly and demonstrate that only under extreme crowding does a well‐capitalized monopoly dominate. Our comparative‐statics yield a comprehensive policy toolkit—transparent margin formulas, volatility‐decay standards, feedback‐cap mechanisms, cross‐margin interoperability, and real‐time crowding metrics—to guide resilient Treasury clearing.

Journal of Futures Markets
Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CCP Competition, Margins, and Crowding in US Treasury Market — Jingrui Li · Journal of Futures Markets (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS