Mid‐term outcomes in patients younger than 65 years undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate favourable functional results with high rates of return to activity and work

Abstract Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate outcomes, return‐to‐activity and work after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years and younger. We hypothesised that patients would achieve functional improvement, with high rates of return to activity and return to work. Methods A retrospective study was conducted for patients aged 65 years and younger who underwent primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (2011–2022) with a minimum 24‐month follow‐up. Outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, pain visual analogue scale, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure, and 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey. Return to activity and work were also assessed with questionnaires. Complications, failures and correlations between age and outcomes were analysed. Results Seventy‐two shoulders in 68 patients (80% of the original cohort) (mean age, 58.5 ± 8.5 years) were available at mean follow‐up of 6.2 ± 2.4 years. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (54.9 vs. 89.9), pain visual analogue scale (4 vs. 0), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (49 vs. 84), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (40.9 vs. 13.6) and 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component (39.6 vs. 51.1) improved postoperatively ( p < 0.001). For the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 80% met the minimal clinically important difference and 64% met the patient acceptable symptom state. Younger age correlated with higher post‐operative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores (rho = –0.35, p = 0.003). No or minimal limitations in recreational and sportive activities were observed in 89% of patients. 72% returned to work within 4 weeks, and 95% reported no or slight work limitation, with greater difficulty among manual labourers. One failure (1%) and two complications (3%) occurred. Conclusion Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years and younger leads to improved functional outcomes and high patient satisfaction at mid‐term follow‐up. Furthermore, it enables high rates of return to both activity and work with low rates of complication and failure. Level of Evidence Level IV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70820
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mid‐term outcomes in patients younger than 65 years undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate favourable functional results with high rates of return to activity and work

Peter J. Millett, Maximilian Hinz, Marco‐Christopher Rupp, Marilee P. Horan et al.
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Mid‐term outcomes in patients younger than 65 years undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate favourable functional results with high rates of return to activity and work

Peter J. Millett, Maximilian Hinz, Marco‐Christopher Rupp, Marilee P. Horan, Grant J. Dornan, Lorenz Fritsch, Alan Villegas Meza, Michael Nocek, Colby Wollenman, Brendon Mitchell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate outcomes, return‐to‐activity and work after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years and younger. We hypothesised that patients would achieve functional improvement, with high rates of return to activity and return to work. Methods A retrospective study was conducted for patients aged 65 years and younger who underwent primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (2011–2022) with a minimum 24‐month follow‐up. Outcomes included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, pain visual analogue scale, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure, and 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey. Return to activity and work were also assessed with questionnaires. Complications, failures and correlations between age and outcomes were analysed. Results Seventy‐two shoulders in 68 patients (80% of the original cohort) (mean age, 58.5 ± 8.5 years) were available at mean follow‐up of 6.2 ± 2.4 years. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (54.9 vs. 89.9), pain visual analogue scale (4 vs. 0), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (49 vs. 84), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (40.9 vs. 13.6) and 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component (39.6 vs. 51.1) improved postoperatively ( p < 0.001). For the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 80% met the minimal clinically important difference and 64% met the patient acceptable symptom state. Younger age correlated with higher post‐operative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores (rho = –0.35, p = 0.003). No or minimal limitations in recreational and sportive activities were observed in 89% of patients. 72% returned to work within 4 weeks, and 95% reported no or slight work limitation, with greater difficulty among manual labourers. One failure (1%) and two complications (3%) occurred. Conclusion Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 65 years and younger leads to improved functional outcomes and high patient satisfaction at mid‐term follow‐up. Furthermore, it enables high rates of return to both activity and work with low rates of complication and failure. Level of Evidence Level IV.

Journal of Experimental OrthopaedicsVol. 13(3)
Institute for Sports Medicine (DE), Steadman Clinic (US), Steadman Philippon Research Institute (US), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.