Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use After Definitive Radiotherapy With vs Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND: For patients with unfavorable intermediate or high risk localized prostate cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy reduces recurrence and improves survival but is underutilized due to toxicity concerns. Patients who forgo initial ADT may later require salvage ADT. Robust real world risk estimates can guide counseling. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using SEER-Medicare. Men aged 66 years diagnosed from 2010 to 2021 and treated with external beam radiotherapy were included. Exposure was concurrent ADT with radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone. Salvage ADT was defined as initiation after the initial treatment period. We estimated cumulative incidence of salvage ADT accounting for death as a competing risk and used Fine-Gray models to obtain adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratios, controlling for demographics, tumor characteristics, and facility factors. RESULTS: Among 5,092 patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, 61.17% received concurrent ADT with definitive RT. Among 6,970 patients with high-risk disease, 89.60% received concurrent ADT with definitive RT. At 5 years, the adjusted cumulative incidence of salvage ADT was 3.53% (RT with ADT) versus 6.07% (RT alone) for unfavorable intermediate-risk, and 5.92% vs 19.17% for high-risk patients. On multivariable analysis, concurrent ADT with definitive RT was associated with a lower risk of salvage ADT in both the unfavorable intermediate-risk group (SHR, 0.56; 95% CI,A 0.45-0.70; p < 0.01) and the high-risk group (SHR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.21-0.31; p < 0.01). Higher PSA was also associated with increased risk for salvage ADT for both risk groups, and higher Gleason score was also associated with increased salvage ADT in high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Omission of initial ADT during RT is associated with an increased risk of salvage ADT in unfavorable intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer. These real-world, population-based estimates help inform patient counseling and facilitate personalized treatment decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Prostate
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70215
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use After Definitive Radiotherapy With vs Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer

Mutlay Sayan, Aaron Katz, Ronald C. Chen, Yahui Xie et al.
The Prostate
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use After Definitive Radiotherapy With vs Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer

Mutlay Sayan, Aaron Katz, Ronald C. Chen, Yahui Xie, Jingzhou Shen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients with unfavorable intermediate or high risk localized prostate cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy reduces recurrence and improves survival but is underutilized due to toxicity concerns. Patients who forgo initial ADT may later require salvage ADT. Robust real world risk estimates can guide counseling. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using SEER-Medicare. Men aged 66 years diagnosed from 2010 to 2021 and treated with external beam radiotherapy were included. Exposure was concurrent ADT with radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone. Salvage ADT was defined as initiation after the initial treatment period. We estimated cumulative incidence of salvage ADT accounting for death as a competing risk and used Fine-Gray models to obtain adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratios, controlling for demographics, tumor characteristics, and facility factors. RESULTS: Among 5,092 patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, 61.17% received concurrent ADT with definitive RT. Among 6,970 patients with high-risk disease, 89.60% received concurrent ADT with definitive RT. At 5 years, the adjusted cumulative incidence of salvage ADT was 3.53% (RT with ADT) versus 6.07% (RT alone) for unfavorable intermediate-risk, and 5.92% vs 19.17% for high-risk patients. On multivariable analysis, concurrent ADT with definitive RT was associated with a lower risk of salvage ADT in both the unfavorable intermediate-risk group (SHR, 0.56; 95% CI,A 0.45-0.70; p < 0.01) and the high-risk group (SHR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.21-0.31; p < 0.01). Higher PSA was also associated with increased risk for salvage ADT for both risk groups, and higher Gleason score was also associated with increased salvage ADT in high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Omission of initial ADT during RT is associated with an increased risk of salvage ADT in unfavorable intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer. These real-world, population-based estimates help inform patient counseling and facilitate personalized treatment decisions.

The Prostate
University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.