Extending the classical sequence–structure–function paradigm through protein dynamics and context‐dependent behavior

The traditional sequence-structure-function paradigm links biological activity to stable three-dimensional structures. However, growing evidence from intrinsically disordered proteins, intrinsically disordered regions, and phase-separating proteins indicates that many proteins function through dynamic conformational ensembles rather than fixed structures alone. These flexible systems adapt to their environments, enabling signal integration, allosteric modulation, and cellular regulation. Biomolecular condensates and dynamic protein assemblies coordinate biochemical activities through reversible, context-responsive interactions. We propose an expanded conceptual model: sequence → dynamics → conformational ensembles → context-dependent behavior. Rather than replacing the classical framework, this perspective serves as a complementary extension within a protein structure-function continuum model. This framework emphasizes conformational flexibility, ensemble redistribution, and cellular context as critical drivers of protein function, regulation, and disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FEBS Letters
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.70404
Primary Topic
RNA Research and Splicing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extending the classical sequence–structure–function paradigm through protein dynamics and context‐dependent behavior

Alessandro Giuliani, Timir Tripathi, Vladimir Nikolaevich Uversky
FEBS Letters
RNA Research and Splicing
article

Extending the classical sequence–structure–function paradigm through protein dynamics and context‐dependent behavior

Alessandro Giuliani, Timir Tripathi, Vladimir Nikolaevich Uversky
article en

Abstract

The traditional sequence-structure-function paradigm links biological activity to stable three-dimensional structures. However, growing evidence from intrinsically disordered proteins, intrinsically disordered regions, and phase-separating proteins indicates that many proteins function through dynamic conformational ensembles rather than fixed structures alone. These flexible systems adapt to their environments, enabling signal integration, allosteric modulation, and cellular regulation. Biomolecular condensates and dynamic protein assemblies coordinate biochemical activities through reversible, context-responsive interactions. We propose an expanded conceptual model: sequence → dynamics → conformational ensembles → context-dependent behavior. Rather than replacing the classical framework, this perspective serves as a complementary extension within a protein structure-function continuum model. This framework emphasizes conformational flexibility, ensemble redistribution, and cellular context as critical drivers of protein function, regulation, and disease.

FEBS Letters
North Eastern Hill University (IN), Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT), USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
RNA Research and Splicing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.