Designing Governance Boundaries for Hospital Bed Management: Balancing Centralized Pooling and Local Protection

Background/Objectives: Hospital-wide bed pooling is widely used in bed-management reform to reduce ward-level mismatch and improve the use of scarce inpatient capacity. However, formally pooled beds are not automatically usable beds. Cross-ward reassignment may require coordination, placement judgment, and timely execution, especially when several wards are under pressure. This study examines hospital bed governance as a healthcare management problem of where to draw the boundary between local protection and centralized pooling. Methods: We develop an α -based governance framework that places full decentralization, bounded centralization, and full centralization within a common design space. The parameter α determines how much ward-level capacity is pooled and how much remains locally protected. The analysis first establishes a frictionless pooling benchmark, and then introduces coordination friction, stress-state pooled-allocation imperfection, and the protective value of local capacity. Scenario-based computational experiments examine the mechanism across operating conditions, alternative friction specifications, and multi-ward extensions. Results: In the frictionless benchmark, full centralization weakly dominates because it has the broadest feasible allocation set. When pooled allocation remains fully effective, full centralization is not substantively outperformed. Coordination friction can move the raw maximizing boundary inward, but this movement does not necessarily imply a meaningful improvement over full centralization. When reassignment becomes less reliable in high-pressure states, however, an interior governance boundary can become substantively attractive by preserving some locally accessible capacity. Conclusions: The findings do not reject centralized pooling. They suggest that bed reform should evaluate both the formal scope of pooling and the operational usability of pooled capacity under pressure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14131949
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing Governance Boundaries for Hospital Bed Management: Balancing Centralized Pooling and Local Protection

Feng Xiao, Yang Xu, Kin Keung Lai, S S Wang
Healthcare
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

Designing Governance Boundaries for Hospital Bed Management: Balancing Centralized Pooling and Local Protection

Feng Xiao, Yang Xu, Kin Keung Lai, S S Wang
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Hospital-wide bed pooling is widely used in bed-management reform to reduce ward-level mismatch and improve the use of scarce inpatient capacity. However, formally pooled beds are not automatically usable beds. Cross-ward reassignment may require coordination, placement judgment, and timely execution, especially when several wards are under pressure. This study examines hospital bed governance as a healthcare management problem of where to draw the boundary between local protection and centralized pooling. Methods: We develop an α -based governance framework that places full decentralization, bounded centralization, and full centralization within a common design space. The parameter α determines how much ward-level capacity is pooled and how much remains locally protected. The analysis first establishes a frictionless pooling benchmark, and then introduces coordination friction, stress-state pooled-allocation imperfection, and the protective value of local capacity. Scenario-based computational experiments examine the mechanism across operating conditions, alternative friction specifications, and multi-ward extensions. Results: In the frictionless benchmark, full centralization weakly dominates because it has the broadest feasible allocation set. When pooled allocation remains fully effective, full centralization is not substantively outperformed. Coordination friction can move the raw maximizing boundary inward, but this movement does not necessarily imply a meaningful improvement over full centralization. When reassignment becomes less reliable in high-pressure states, however, an interior governance boundary can become substantively attractive by preserving some locally accessible capacity. Conclusions: The findings do not reject centralized pooling. They suggest that bed reform should evaluate both the formal scope of pooling and the operational usability of pooled capacity under pressure.

HealthcareVol. 14(13)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Xi'an Physical Education University (CN), Xi'an Technological University (CN), Shaanxi Normal University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Xi'an Technological University
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.