Do Kenyan Consumers Crave Change? Combining Q-methodology and a Choice Experiment to Explore Sustainable Food Preferences

Understanding consumer preferences in data-scarce contexts poses significant challenges. Stated-preference methods such as choice experiments (CEs) are widely used but often struggle to identify attributes that are both empirically valid and contextually meaningful. A key limitation lies in selecting attributes that reflect respondents’ values rather than researchers’ assumptions. To address this, this article introduces a methodological innovation that combines Q-methodology (Q) and a CE to enhance both the design and interpretation of preference studies within sustainability research. Within this study, Q identified how individuals perceive and prioritise sustainability-related characteristics, while the CE quantified the trade-offs consumers make among these characteristics. The approach is illustrated through a case study of Kenyan consumers’ preferences for sustainably produced food – a context characterised by rapid population growth, high climate vulnerability, and shifting dietary patterns. Drawing on survey data from 559 consumers, the Q-CE combination demonstrates how qualitative insights into locally grounded understandings of sustainability can be systematically translated into quantifiable CE attributes and used to deepen the interpretation of CE outcomes. This combination ensures that the CE reflects contextually valid, stakeholder-informed dimensions of sustainability, while Q results provide a complementary interpretive lens that explains underlying motivations and value framings behind consumer preferences. By linking qualitative perceptions with quantitative measures, the combined approach reduces researcher bias, strengthens contextual validity, and deepens interpretive insight. The study offers a transparent and replicable procedure for designing Q-informed CEs, and provides actionable implications for promoting sustainable consumption through targeted incentives, reduced food loss, and consumer awareness initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Food Systems
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clfs.2026.100051
Primary Topic
Q Methodology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Kenyan Consumers Crave Change? Combining Q-methodology and a Choice Experiment to Explore Sustainable Food Preferences

Sophie Van Schoubroeck, Jan Cools, Soukaina Anougmar, Steven Van Passel et al.
Cleaner Food Systems
Q Methodology Applications
article

Do Kenyan Consumers Crave Change? Combining Q-methodology and a Choice Experiment to Explore Sustainable Food Preferences

Sophie Van Schoubroeck, Jan Cools, Soukaina Anougmar, Steven Van Passel, Maíra Finizola e Silva
article en

Abstract

Understanding consumer preferences in data-scarce contexts poses significant challenges. Stated-preference methods such as choice experiments (CEs) are widely used but often struggle to identify attributes that are both empirically valid and contextually meaningful. A key limitation lies in selecting attributes that reflect respondents’ values rather than researchers’ assumptions. To address this, this article introduces a methodological innovation that combines Q-methodology (Q) and a CE to enhance both the design and interpretation of preference studies within sustainability research. Within this study, Q identified how individuals perceive and prioritise sustainability-related characteristics, while the CE quantified the trade-offs consumers make among these characteristics. The approach is illustrated through a case study of Kenyan consumers’ preferences for sustainably produced food – a context characterised by rapid population growth, high climate vulnerability, and shifting dietary patterns. Drawing on survey data from 559 consumers, the Q-CE combination demonstrates how qualitative insights into locally grounded understandings of sustainability can be systematically translated into quantifiable CE attributes and used to deepen the interpretation of CE outcomes. This combination ensures that the CE reflects contextually valid, stakeholder-informed dimensions of sustainability, while Q results provide a complementary interpretive lens that explains underlying motivations and value framings behind consumer preferences. By linking qualitative perceptions with quantitative measures, the combined approach reduces researcher bias, strengthens contextual validity, and deepens interpretive insight. The study offers a transparent and replicable procedure for designing Q-informed CEs, and provides actionable implications for promoting sustainable consumption through targeted incentives, reduced food loss, and consumer awareness initiatives.

Cleaner Food Systems
University of Antwerp (BE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Q Methodology Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.