Biocrusts enhance erosion resistance of soils derived from two lithologies in the karst region of Southwest China

Soil detachment capacity ( D c ) is a crucial parameter in process-based erosion models. This study investigated moss-covered soils derived from dolomite and clastic rock in Southwest China’s karst region, employing indoor scouring experiments integrated with analyses of moss biocrust growth characteristics, soil properties, and aggregate stability to elucidate the effects of lithology and biocrust coverage on erosion processes. Results indicated that biocrust thickness, roughness, and biomass were significantly influenced by lithology and coverage. Biocrusts on clastic rock exhibited better growth, and their growth factors were more sensitive to coverage gradients than those on dolomite. As coverage increased from 1 to 20 % to 80–100 %, erosion resistance increased significantly, prolonging breakthrough time by 1.11–15.82 times. Biocrust coverage substantially suppressed D c . At 20–40 % coverage, D c significantly decreased by 66.06–83.51 % in dolomite and by 74.07–85.69 % in clastic rock, and soil erosion was nearly negligible under high coverage (>60 %). Coverage and thickness were key regulators of D c for both lithologies (dolomite: total effect = –0.752; clastic: total effect = –0.819). In terms of soil properties, D c in dolomite was primarily governed by sand content, whereas in clastic soils it was jointly regulated by sand content and bulk density. Compared with bare soil, soil rill erodibility decreased by 8.72–99.98 % (dolomite) and 39.60–99.93 % (clastic) with increasing coverage, and clastic biocrusts exhibited greater erosion-reduction efficiency per unit increase in coverage, with thickness identified as the principal erosion-inhibiting factor. This study revealed that biocrusts enhance erosion resistance through synergistic regulation of growth factors and soil properties, providing a foundation for karst erosion modeling and precision conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.117910
Primary Topic
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biocrusts enhance erosion resistance of soils derived from two lithologies in the karst region of Southwest China

Z Li, Shiqin Zhang, Fang Wang, Yuanfeng Yang et al.
Geoderma
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
article

Biocrusts enhance erosion resistance of soils derived from two lithologies in the karst region of Southwest China

Z Li, Shiqin Zhang, Fang Wang, Yuanfeng Yang, Junrong Qin, Yusong Deng
article en

Abstract

Soil detachment capacity ( D c ) is a crucial parameter in process-based erosion models. This study investigated moss-covered soils derived from dolomite and clastic rock in Southwest China’s karst region, employing indoor scouring experiments integrated with analyses of moss biocrust growth characteristics, soil properties, and aggregate stability to elucidate the effects of lithology and biocrust coverage on erosion processes. Results indicated that biocrust thickness, roughness, and biomass were significantly influenced by lithology and coverage. Biocrusts on clastic rock exhibited better growth, and their growth factors were more sensitive to coverage gradients than those on dolomite. As coverage increased from 1 to 20 % to 80–100 %, erosion resistance increased significantly, prolonging breakthrough time by 1.11–15.82 times. Biocrust coverage substantially suppressed D c . At 20–40 % coverage, D c significantly decreased by 66.06–83.51 % in dolomite and by 74.07–85.69 % in clastic rock, and soil erosion was nearly negligible under high coverage (>60 %). Coverage and thickness were key regulators of D c for both lithologies (dolomite: total effect = –0.752; clastic: total effect = –0.819). In terms of soil properties, D c in dolomite was primarily governed by sand content, whereas in clastic soils it was jointly regulated by sand content and bulk density. Compared with bare soil, soil rill erodibility decreased by 8.72–99.98 % (dolomite) and 39.60–99.93 % (clastic) with increasing coverage, and clastic biocrusts exhibited greater erosion-reduction efficiency per unit increase in coverage, with thickness identified as the principal erosion-inhibiting factor. This study revealed that biocrusts enhance erosion resistance through synergistic regulation of growth factors and soil properties, providing a foundation for karst erosion modeling and precision conservation.

GeodermaVol. 472
Guangxi University (CN), State Key Laboratory For Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources (CN)
Guangxi University
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.