Topical issues of interventional pain management in neurology: legal aspects

Objective. To update knowledge on interventional pain management techniques in neurology from the perspective of current Russian law. Material and methods. The article highlights the issues and problems of interventional pain treatment in neurology preserved in Russian law since 2019. Results. Knowledge about interventional pain treatment in neurology from the point of view of labor and specialized legislation is updated. Individual problems of interventional pain treatment in neurology from the point of view of Russian law are highlighted on the background of no separate rules for neurologists in labor law and increasing role of guidelines gradually consolidating recommendations on interventional pain treatment in neurology. Conclusion. There is a persistent gap between clinical practice in neurology and rules described in certain regulatory legal acts. The lack of legally mandated skills for interventional procedures in professional standards and educational standards has not yet been addressed. No regulations specifying the technique and composition of injections for therapeutic blockades create significant challenges for assessing the quality and safety of such procedures including court cases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Pain
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/pain20262402153
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Topical issues of interventional pain management in neurology: legal aspects

Ya. V. Alekseeva, T.V. Andrianova, E.S. Mitrofanova, M.V. Sviridov et al.
Russian Journal of Pain
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
article

Topical issues of interventional pain management in neurology: legal aspects

Ya. V. Alekseeva, T.V. Andrianova, E.S. Mitrofanova, M.V. Sviridov, A.V. Alekseev
article en

Abstract

Objective. To update knowledge on interventional pain management techniques in neurology from the perspective of current Russian law. Material and methods. The article highlights the issues and problems of interventional pain treatment in neurology preserved in Russian law since 2019. Results. Knowledge about interventional pain treatment in neurology from the point of view of labor and specialized legislation is updated. Individual problems of interventional pain treatment in neurology from the point of view of Russian law are highlighted on the background of no separate rules for neurologists in labor law and increasing role of guidelines gradually consolidating recommendations on interventional pain treatment in neurology. Conclusion. There is a persistent gap between clinical practice in neurology and rules described in certain regulatory legal acts. The lack of legally mandated skills for interventional procedures in professional standards and educational standards has not yet been addressed. No regulations specifying the technique and composition of injections for therapeutic blockades create significant challenges for assessing the quality and safety of such procedures including court cases.

Russian Journal of PainVol. 24(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Healthcare Systems and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Topical issues of interventional pain management in neurology: legal aspects — Ya. V. Alekseeva, T.V. Andrianova, et al. · Russian Journal of Pain (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS