MRI Dark–Light–Dark Sign and Node Reporting Score: An Integrated Model for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and incremental value of the dark-light-dark (DLD) sign combined with the Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 166 patients with histopathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI and subsequent histopathological nodal assessment. Node-RADS score and DLD status were independently assessed by three blinded radiologists, followed by consensus review. Multivariable logistic regression was used to construct a combined DLD + Node-RADS model. Model discrimination was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and DeLong’s test. Calibration, bootstrap internal validation, and decision curve analyses were performed to assess the model’s reliability and potential clinical utility. Results: Histopathological lymph node metastasis was observed in 122/166 patients (73.5%). Both the Node-RADS score and DLD-negative status were significantly associated with nodal metastasis. In multivariable analysis, the Node-RADS score remained independently associated with lymph node metastasis (adjusted OR, 2.054; 95% CI, 1.455–2.899; p < 0.001), and DLD-negative status was an independent predictor after adjustment for Node-RADS (adjusted OR, 6.635; 95% CI, 2.873–15.319; p < 0.001). The combined model achieved higher discriminatory performance (AUC, 0.795; 95% CI, 0.715–0.875) than Node-RADS alone (AUC, 0.740) and DLD status alone (AUC, 0.713), with significant improvements according to DeLong analysis. Calibration analysis demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes (Brier score, 0.142; Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.101), and bootstrap internal validation suggested stable performance. Decision curve analysis showed a greater net benefit for the combined model across clinically relevant threshold probabilities. Conclusions: The integration of DLD status with Node-RADS showed potential incremental value for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis compared with either approach alone. The combined model demonstrated good calibration, stable internal performance, and potential clinical utility. This imaging-based strategy may provide complementary risk stratification, particularly in indeterminate nodal categories, although external validation is required before routine clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15135146
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MRI Dark–Light–Dark Sign and Node Reporting Score: An Integrated Model for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer

Zeynel Abidin Taş, Görkem Özdemir, Timuçin Çil, Okan Dılek et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

MRI Dark–Light–Dark Sign and Node Reporting Score: An Integrated Model for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer

Zeynel Abidin Taş, Görkem Özdemir, Timuçin Çil, Okan Dılek, Cenk Parlatan, Seyda Gokce Turunc
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and incremental value of the dark-light-dark (DLD) sign combined with the Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 166 patients with histopathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI and subsequent histopathological nodal assessment. Node-RADS score and DLD status were independently assessed by three blinded radiologists, followed by consensus review. Multivariable logistic regression was used to construct a combined DLD + Node-RADS model. Model discrimination was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and DeLong’s test. Calibration, bootstrap internal validation, and decision curve analyses were performed to assess the model’s reliability and potential clinical utility. Results: Histopathological lymph node metastasis was observed in 122/166 patients (73.5%). Both the Node-RADS score and DLD-negative status were significantly associated with nodal metastasis. In multivariable analysis, the Node-RADS score remained independently associated with lymph node metastasis (adjusted OR, 2.054; 95% CI, 1.455–2.899; p < 0.001), and DLD-negative status was an independent predictor after adjustment for Node-RADS (adjusted OR, 6.635; 95% CI, 2.873–15.319; p < 0.001). The combined model achieved higher discriminatory performance (AUC, 0.795; 95% CI, 0.715–0.875) than Node-RADS alone (AUC, 0.740) and DLD status alone (AUC, 0.713), with significant improvements according to DeLong analysis. Calibration analysis demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes (Brier score, 0.142; Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.101), and bootstrap internal validation suggested stable performance. Decision curve analysis showed a greater net benefit for the combined model across clinically relevant threshold probabilities. Conclusions: The integration of DLD status with Node-RADS showed potential incremental value for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis compared with either approach alone. The combined model demonstrated good calibration, stable internal performance, and potential clinical utility. This imaging-based strategy may provide complementary risk stratification, particularly in indeterminate nodal categories, although external validation is required before routine clinical implementation.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(13)
Başkent University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.