“As for stigma? … I don't think I'd be going to my next-door neighbor saying ‘I'm going for lung cancer screening’”: a qualitative study of the potential impacts of stigma during lung cancer screening in Australia

Abstract Introduction Lung cancer stigma is widespread, with consequences for patients psychologically and clinically. It can also be a barrier to lung cancer screening (LCS), though current evidence is limited. With LCS programs in development globally, this qualitative study explored the views, expectations, and potential impacts of stigma with people eligible for LCS before commencement of the Australian National LCS Program. Methods Participants met eligibility criteria for the Australian National LCS Program (asymptomatic of lung cancer; aged 50-70 years; currently smoking tobacco cigarettes or quit within 10 years; ≥30 pack-year smoking history). Abductive thematic analysis was used. Interview questions and theory-based codes were guided by the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework. Results Twenty-four participants were interviewed; 50% (n = 12) were currently smoking and 25% (n = 6) were from culturally or linguistically diverse backgrounds. Most participants had high levels of education, high self-reported health literacy and lived in major cities. Four themes were identified: (1) Harmful narratives of personal responsibility and self-infliction; (2) Smoking stigma is a “necessary evil” and is inevitable in LCS; (3) Identity as part of the LCS cohort; (4) Previous perceptions of stigma in healthcare shape expectations for LCS. Conclusion Stigma in LCS – to some degree – is unavoidable given smoking-based eligibility criteria but may be reduced through: (1) messaging that dismantles industry-driven narratives around responsibility, blame and choice in tobacco use (e.g., by referencing external determinants of smoking behavior); (2) privacy and confidentiality of LCS participation; (3) communication training for LCS staff. Further work in priority communities considering intersectional stigmas is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntag141
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“As for stigma? … I don't think I'd be going to my next-door neighbor saying ‘I'm going for lung cancer screening’”: a qualitative study of the potential impacts of stigma during lung cancer screening in Australia

Brooke Nickel, Nehmat Houssami, Nathan John Harrison, Rachael H Dodd et al.
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

“As for stigma? … I don't think I'd be going to my next-door neighbor saying ‘I'm going for lung cancer screening’”: a qualitative study of the potential impacts of stigma during lung cancer screening in Australia

Brooke Nickel, Nehmat Houssami, Nathan John Harrison, Rachael H Dodd, Marianne Frances Weber, Nicole Marion Rankin, Giselle Hollinshead, Kathleen McFadden, Shiho Rose
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Lung cancer stigma is widespread, with consequences for patients psychologically and clinically. It can also be a barrier to lung cancer screening (LCS), though current evidence is limited. With LCS programs in development globally, this qualitative study explored the views, expectations, and potential impacts of stigma with people eligible for LCS before commencement of the Australian National LCS Program. Methods Participants met eligibility criteria for the Australian National LCS Program (asymptomatic of lung cancer; aged 50-70 years; currently smoking tobacco cigarettes or quit within 10 years; ≥30 pack-year smoking history). Abductive thematic analysis was used. Interview questions and theory-based codes were guided by the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework. Results Twenty-four participants were interviewed; 50% (n = 12) were currently smoking and 25% (n = 6) were from culturally or linguistically diverse backgrounds. Most participants had high levels of education, high self-reported health literacy and lived in major cities. Four themes were identified: (1) Harmful narratives of personal responsibility and self-infliction; (2) Smoking stigma is a “necessary evil” and is inevitable in LCS; (3) Identity as part of the LCS cohort; (4) Previous perceptions of stigma in healthcare shape expectations for LCS. Conclusion Stigma in LCS – to some degree – is unavoidable given smoking-based eligibility criteria but may be reduced through: (1) messaging that dismantles industry-driven narratives around responsibility, blame and choice in tobacco use (e.g., by referencing external determinants of smoking behavior); (2) privacy and confidentiality of LCS participation; (3) communication training for LCS staff. Further work in priority communities considering intersectional stigmas is needed.

Nicotine & Tobacco Research
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Flinders University (AU), Advocate Health Care (US), Melbourne Health (AU), National Health and Medical Research Council (AU), Cancer Council NSW (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.