A critique of South Africa's National Human Resources Development Strategies

This article provides a critique of South Africa's two National Human Resources Development Strategies (NHRDS). It does so through the construction and utilisation of a three-fold definition of HRD. South Africa's HRD strategies fall short when measured against each of these three components. This has to do with the failure to view HRD as a cross-sectoral phenomenon characterised by several interdependent relationships spanning the education, training, industry, science, technology and labour market policy domains. The NHRDS have focused primarily on educational objectives whilst neglecting the above interdependencies. Policy failure is also a consequence of poor horizontal coordination and interdepartmental cooperation within the South African state. Finally, failure has to do with inadequate management information systems and the poor exchange of strategic intelligence between key actors across the demand-and-supply divide, and between key government departments supposedly involved in the horizontal coordination of HRD.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/32853284
Primary Topic
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A critique of South Africa's National Human Resources Development Strategies

Human Sciences Research Council
Human Science Research Council SA
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
article

A critique of South Africa's National Human Resources Development Strategies

Human Sciences Research Council
article en

Abstract

This article provides a critique of South Africa's two National Human Resources Development Strategies (NHRDS). It does so through the construction and utilisation of a three-fold definition of HRD. South Africa's HRD strategies fall short when measured against each of these three components. This has to do with the failure to view HRD as a cross-sectoral phenomenon characterised by several interdependent relationships spanning the education, training, industry, science, technology and labour market policy domains. The NHRDS have focused primarily on educational objectives whilst neglecting the above interdependencies. Policy failure is also a consequence of poor horizontal coordination and interdepartmental cooperation within the South African state. Finally, failure has to do with inadequate management information systems and the poor exchange of strategic intelligence between key actors across the demand-and-supply divide, and between key government departments supposedly involved in the horizontal coordination of HRD.

Human Science Research Council SA
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A critique of South Africa's National Human Resources Development Strategies — Human Sciences Research Council · Human Science Research Council SA (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS