Bacteriophage therapy in musculoskeletal infections: a systematic review

Abstract Background Bone and joint infections are a therapeutic dilemma for healthcare providers in all fields. Musculoskeletal infections, particularly those associated with implants or chronic osteomyelitis, continue to pose a therapeutic challenge. Treatment failures remain common, especially in the context of multidrug-resistant organisms or biofilm-mediated persistence. Given these challenges, bacteriophage therapy (BT) has emerged as a promising adjunctive or salvage modality. This systematic review aims to critically evaluate the current clinical evidence regarding the application, outcomes, and safety profile of BT in the management of complex bacterial musculoskeletal infections. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA statement. PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science were accessed in July 2025. No time constraints were used for the search. All clinical studies investigating BT for bacterial musculoskeletal infections were considered for eligibility. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for case reports and case series. Results Twenty-seven clinical studies were included, comprising a total of 105 patients. The mean age was 58.9 ± 22.4 years, and 23.8% (25/105) were women. The overall complication rate was 18.1% (19/105). A change in the dominant infecting pathogen during treatment was observed in 2.9% of cases (3/105). Across the included reports, most patients achieved clinical improvement with infection control and, where applicable, implant retention following adjunctive bacteriophage therapy. Conclusions Bacteriophage therapy may represent a promising adjunctive option for selected cases of musculoskeletal infections that are unresponsive to standard treatments. Nevertheless, the current evidence remains extremely limited and heterogeneous, being based almost exclusively on case reports and small case series. At present, bacteriophage therapy should be regarded as experimental, and its clinical role cannot be defined without high-quality prospective and randomised studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of medical research
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-04808-9
Primary Topic
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bacteriophage therapy in musculoskeletal infections: a systematic review

Filippo Migliorini, Philipp Kobbe, Ulf Krister Hofmann, Christian Fischer et al.
European journal of medical research
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
article

Bacteriophage therapy in musculoskeletal infections: a systematic review

Filippo Migliorini, Philipp Kobbe, Ulf Krister Hofmann, Christian Fischer, Luise Schäfer, Jörg Eschweiler, Steffen Langwald
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Bone and joint infections are a therapeutic dilemma for healthcare providers in all fields. Musculoskeletal infections, particularly those associated with implants or chronic osteomyelitis, continue to pose a therapeutic challenge. Treatment failures remain common, especially in the context of multidrug-resistant organisms or biofilm-mediated persistence. Given these challenges, bacteriophage therapy (BT) has emerged as a promising adjunctive or salvage modality. This systematic review aims to critically evaluate the current clinical evidence regarding the application, outcomes, and safety profile of BT in the management of complex bacterial musculoskeletal infections. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA statement. PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science were accessed in July 2025. No time constraints were used for the search. All clinical studies investigating BT for bacterial musculoskeletal infections were considered for eligibility. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for case reports and case series. Results Twenty-seven clinical studies were included, comprising a total of 105 patients. The mean age was 58.9 ± 22.4 years, and 23.8% (25/105) were women. The overall complication rate was 18.1% (19/105). A change in the dominant infecting pathogen during treatment was observed in 2.9% of cases (3/105). Across the included reports, most patients achieved clinical improvement with infection control and, where applicable, implant retention following adjunctive bacteriophage therapy. Conclusions Bacteriophage therapy may represent a promising adjunctive option for selected cases of musculoskeletal infections that are unresponsive to standard treatments. Nevertheless, the current evidence remains extremely limited and heterogeneous, being based almost exclusively on case reports and small case series. At present, bacteriophage therapy should be regarded as experimental, and its clinical role cannot be defined without high-quality prospective and randomised studies.

European journal of medical researchVol. 31(1)
Ospedale di Bolzano (IT), BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle (DE), Link Campus University (IT), PerkinElmer (United States) (US), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.