Translation, Content Validity, and Psychometric Evaluation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in Standard Arabic

Background: Arabic-speaking populations lack a brief, psychometrically evaluated instrument for assessing maladaptive personality traits within the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). Objective: To translate the Personality Inventory for DSM-5—Brief Form (PID-5-BF) into Standard Arabic and evaluate its content validity, reliability, and factor structure in a Saudi community sample. Methods: The PID-5-BF was translated through a multistep forward–backward procedure with expert panel review. Twenty-five pilot participants rated item clarity and simplicity. The final Arabic version was administered to 328 Saudi adults, and 52 verified pairs completed it twice over a mean interval of 16.1 days. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested the a priori five-factor model. Principal axis factoring with Promax rotation and Horn’s parallel analysis were used to examine factor retention. Reliability indices included Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC(2,1), absolute agreement]. Results: Content validity was excellent (S-CVI/Ave = 0.93 for clarity; 0.94 for simplicity). CFA showed an acceptable RMSEA (0.068, 90% CI 0.062–0.075) but incremental fit below thresholds (CFI = 0.84; TLI = 0.82; SRMR = 0.12). Parallel analysis retained four factors. Domain alphas ranged from 0.70 to 0.78 (total = 0.89), and domain ICCs were 0.74 to 0.85 (total = 0.88). Antagonism items showed 50–58% floor effects. Conclusions: The standard-Arabic PID-5-BF shows acceptable content validity, internal consistency, and temporal stability, with partial structural support. Further work using ordinal estimation, measurement invariance testing, and external validity assessment is needed before routine clinical adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14131917
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation, Content Validity, and Psychometric Evaluation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in Standard Arabic

Anas Alrasheed, Saleh A. Alghamdi, Abdulrahman Kariri, Muhammad Shakir Raza et al.
Healthcare
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Translation, Content Validity, and Psychometric Evaluation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in Standard Arabic

Anas Alrasheed, Saleh A. Alghamdi, Abdulrahman Kariri, Muhammad Shakir Raza, Osama Alghamdi
article en

Abstract

Background: Arabic-speaking populations lack a brief, psychometrically evaluated instrument for assessing maladaptive personality traits within the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). Objective: To translate the Personality Inventory for DSM-5—Brief Form (PID-5-BF) into Standard Arabic and evaluate its content validity, reliability, and factor structure in a Saudi community sample. Methods: The PID-5-BF was translated through a multistep forward–backward procedure with expert panel review. Twenty-five pilot participants rated item clarity and simplicity. The final Arabic version was administered to 328 Saudi adults, and 52 verified pairs completed it twice over a mean interval of 16.1 days. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested the a priori five-factor model. Principal axis factoring with Promax rotation and Horn’s parallel analysis were used to examine factor retention. Reliability indices included Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC(2,1), absolute agreement]. Results: Content validity was excellent (S-CVI/Ave = 0.93 for clarity; 0.94 for simplicity). CFA showed an acceptable RMSEA (0.068, 90% CI 0.062–0.075) but incremental fit below thresholds (CFI = 0.84; TLI = 0.82; SRMR = 0.12). Parallel analysis retained four factors. Domain alphas ranged from 0.70 to 0.78 (total = 0.89), and domain ICCs were 0.74 to 0.85 (total = 0.88). Antagonism items showed 50–58% floor effects. Conclusions: The standard-Arabic PID-5-BF shows acceptable content validity, internal consistency, and temporal stability, with partial structural support. Further work using ordinal estimation, measurement invariance testing, and external validity assessment is needed before routine clinical adoption.

HealthcareVol. 14(13)
University of Sargodha (PK), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.