Current and future trends and issues facing technology education - an international Delphi study

Abstract This study is the result of international research collaboration aimed at identifying current and future trends and issues in technology education in Belgium (Flanders), Finland, Japan, the Netherlands and the United States by replicating Wicklein's (1993) study. First, in 2019–2020, information was collected from technology education stakeholders in all participating countries using a three-round Delphi method. Although the number of participants and data processing procedures varied slightly in individual studies, this study was able to summarise the five most important positive and negative trends and issues reported in technology education in the participating countries. One of the five most important positive and negative trends related to the technology education curriculum and its position in the curriculum, as well as the content of technology education. One of the five most important positive trends and issues was related to the emphasis on hands-on and/or problem-solving approaches in technology and engineering education. In addition, all studies clearly identified the need for a comprehensive approach to ensure professional development opportunities and provide adequate resources for technology education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-026-10105-7
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current and future trends and issues facing technology education - an international Delphi study

Chikahiko Yata, Marc J. de Vries, Jan Ardies, Ray Wu-Rorrer et al.
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Current and future trends and issues facing technology education - an international Delphi study

Chikahiko Yata, Marc J. de Vries, Jan Ardies, Ray Wu-Rorrer, Johnny J. Moye, Aki Rasinen, Sonja Niiranen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study is the result of international research collaboration aimed at identifying current and future trends and issues in technology education in Belgium (Flanders), Finland, Japan, the Netherlands and the United States by replicating Wicklein's (1993) study. First, in 2019–2020, information was collected from technology education stakeholders in all participating countries using a three-round Delphi method. Although the number of participants and data processing procedures varied slightly in individual studies, this study was able to summarise the five most important positive and negative trends and issues reported in technology education in the participating countries. One of the five most important positive and negative trends related to the technology education curriculum and its position in the curriculum, as well as the content of technology education. One of the five most important positive trends and issues was related to the emphasis on hands-on and/or problem-solving approaches in technology and engineering education. In addition, all studies clearly identified the need for a comprehensive approach to ensure professional development opportunities and provide adequate resources for technology education.

International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Hiroshima University (JP), Artesis Plantijn Hogeschool Antwerpen (BE), University of Antwerp (BE), Tampere University (FI), Buffalo VA Medical Center (US), Province of Antwerp (BE), Virginia Tech (US), University of Jyväskylä (FI), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.