Equity in virtual urgent care: lessons from health system-based models

Virtual urgent care (VUC) is a leading sector of the US$12·2 billion US virtual health-care market, often improving access by reducing geographical barriers, lowering costs, and expanding availability. However, treating all VUC models as equivalent in research, practice, and policy is misleading and potentially harmful. VUC models vary substantially across health-care systems, influencing care delivery, cost, and patient access. Overlooking these differences could exacerbate health-care disparities. In this Viewpoint, we describe several VUC models across three health systems and apply Penchansky and Thomas' five key access dimensions-availability, accessibility, accommodation, affordability, and acceptability-to highlight how different models uniquely affect health-care equity. To ensure VUC reaches all patients, health systems should tailor models to diverse population needs and address barriers such as technology access and digital literacy. Future research should examine how various VUC designs affect health equity and test strategies to better meet the needs of underserved communities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Digital Health
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landig.2026.101015
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equity in virtual urgent care: lessons from health system-based models

Kristin L. Rising, Lindsay Allen, Esther Choo, Victoria Weston et al.
The Lancet Digital Health
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Equity in virtual urgent care: lessons from health system-based models

Kristin L. Rising, Lindsay Allen, Esther Choo, Victoria Weston, Danielle McCarthy, C Maxwell Kelly
article en

Abstract

Virtual urgent care (VUC) is a leading sector of the US$12·2 billion US virtual health-care market, often improving access by reducing geographical barriers, lowering costs, and expanding availability. However, treating all VUC models as equivalent in research, practice, and policy is misleading and potentially harmful. VUC models vary substantially across health-care systems, influencing care delivery, cost, and patient access. Overlooking these differences could exacerbate health-care disparities. In this Viewpoint, we describe several VUC models across three health systems and apply Penchansky and Thomas' five key access dimensions-availability, accessibility, accommodation, affordability, and acceptability-to highlight how different models uniquely affect health-care equity. To ensure VUC reaches all patients, health systems should tailor models to diverse population needs and address barriers such as technology access and digital literacy. Future research should examine how various VUC designs affect health equity and test strategies to better meet the needs of underserved communities.

The Lancet Digital Health
Northwestern University (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Equity in virtual urgent care: lessons from health system-based models — Kristin L. Rising, Lindsay Allen, et al. · The Lancet Digital Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS