A novel bimanual endoluminal robotic platform compatible with standard gastroscopes for endoscopic submucosal dissection: preclinical feasibility and ergonomic evaluation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of early gastrointestinal neoplasia but remains technically demanding because of limited traction, lack of triangulation, and high operator workload, contributing to a steep learning curve. We evaluated a novel endoluminal robotic platform designed to provide surgical-like bimanual triangulation, stable traction/counter-traction, and improved ergonomics while preserving compatibility with standard gastroscopes. METHODS: The robotic system (Intilume System, Agilis Robotics, Hong Kong, SAR) uses an external positioning cart to drive two 3.5-mm flexible robotic instruments mounted onto a native gastroscope via a cap-and-sheath interface and controlled by compact pen-style motion-tracking controllers enabling seated operation. Available instruments included a bipolar T-knife and a tissue grasper. In a randomized crossover ex vivo porcine stomach study, two gastroenterology fellows without prior ESD experience and two interventional endoscopy fellows with early experience each performed four ESDs (two robotic, two conventional), for a total of 16 procedures. Outcomes included en bloc resection, procedure time, specimen surface area, dissection speed, tissue injury, and operator workload assessed using NASA-TLX, with exploratory OSATS and GEARS evaluations. RESULTS: /min; p = 0.05). No muscular injuries occurred with robotic ESD compared with 5/8 conventional cases; no full-thickness injuries occurred. Operator workload was markedly lower with robotic ESD (NASA-TLX 34.7 ± 24.1 vs 75.0 ± 15.4; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In a randomized ex vivo model, a bimanual endoluminal robotic platform compatible with standard endoscopes demonstrated promising improvements in ESD efficiency, tissue control, and operator ergonomics compared with conventional ESD. These preliminary findings support further development and progression to first-in-human feasibility evaluation, with potential to facilitate ESD skill acquisition pending clinical validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-12972-6
Primary Topic
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel bimanual endoluminal robotic platform compatible with standard gastroscopes for endoscopic submucosal dissection: preclinical feasibility and ergonomic evaluation

Amit Bhatt, Ji Seok Park, Sera Satoi, Yung Lee et al.
Surgical Endoscopy
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
article

A novel bimanual endoluminal robotic platform compatible with standard gastroscopes for endoscopic submucosal dissection: preclinical feasibility and ergonomic evaluation

Amit Bhatt, Ji Seok Park, Sera Satoi, Yung Lee, Vikash FNU, Stephen Firkins, Kyungran Justina Cho
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of early gastrointestinal neoplasia but remains technically demanding because of limited traction, lack of triangulation, and high operator workload, contributing to a steep learning curve. We evaluated a novel endoluminal robotic platform designed to provide surgical-like bimanual triangulation, stable traction/counter-traction, and improved ergonomics while preserving compatibility with standard gastroscopes. METHODS: The robotic system (Intilume System, Agilis Robotics, Hong Kong, SAR) uses an external positioning cart to drive two 3.5-mm flexible robotic instruments mounted onto a native gastroscope via a cap-and-sheath interface and controlled by compact pen-style motion-tracking controllers enabling seated operation. Available instruments included a bipolar T-knife and a tissue grasper. In a randomized crossover ex vivo porcine stomach study, two gastroenterology fellows without prior ESD experience and two interventional endoscopy fellows with early experience each performed four ESDs (two robotic, two conventional), for a total of 16 procedures. Outcomes included en bloc resection, procedure time, specimen surface area, dissection speed, tissue injury, and operator workload assessed using NASA-TLX, with exploratory OSATS and GEARS evaluations. RESULTS: /min; p = 0.05). No muscular injuries occurred with robotic ESD compared with 5/8 conventional cases; no full-thickness injuries occurred. Operator workload was markedly lower with robotic ESD (NASA-TLX 34.7 ± 24.1 vs 75.0 ± 15.4; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In a randomized ex vivo model, a bimanual endoluminal robotic platform compatible with standard endoscopes demonstrated promising improvements in ESD efficiency, tissue control, and operator ergonomics compared with conventional ESD. These preliminary findings support further development and progression to first-in-human feasibility evaluation, with potential to facilitate ESD skill acquisition pending clinical validation.

Surgical Endoscopy
Cleveland Clinic (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.