Micro-costing of dental prosthetics in jaw reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Dental rehabilitation has a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction of the jaw. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology allows for precise and timely delivery of an implant-retained dental prosthesis. This study characterizes the cost to produce a point of care (in-house) 3D-printed resin dental prostheses for patients undergoing osseous free flap reconstruction. METHODOLOGY: Implant-retained dental prostheses for patients undergoing osseous free flap reconstruction of the maxilla or mandible produced by the Integrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction (IPR) laboratory at Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Hospital between July 2023 and June 2024 were analysed. The costs of producing the prostheses were calculated using a "bottom up" approach where all activities associated with start-up, planning and fabrication were accounted for and unit costs for each activity quantified. Prostheses with incomplete data were excluded. All costs are reported in 2024 as USD. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients met the study inclusion criteria of which the majority (n = 19) underwent mandibular reconstruction. Twelve patients underwent reconstruction for benign disease and 17 patients had the prosthesis placed at the primary reconstruction. The mean cost of producing the dental prosthesis was $861.72 (range: $702.78 - $1032.34). Start-up costs were the highest contributor (mean cost $333.71) per prosthesis, followed by the design/planning phase (mean cost $260.37), and fabrication phase (mean cost $267.64). The overall cost increased with increasing number of implant fixtures and the number of prosthetic units placed. CONCLUSION: VSP and CAD/CAM technology allows for rapid and accessible dental rehabilitation following osseous free flap reconstruction. However, the significant startup costs of these technologies are likely to be a barrier to institutions wanting to introduce point-of-care manufacturing of dental prosthetics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-026-00333-x
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Micro-costing of dental prosthetics in jaw reconstruction.

Rebecca L. Venchiarutti, YY Aung, George A. Petrides, Aleksey D’Jamirze et al.
PubMed
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Micro-costing of dental prosthetics in jaw reconstruction.

Rebecca L. Venchiarutti, YY Aung, George A. Petrides, Aleksey D’Jamirze, Chris Ormsby, Dale Howes, Timothy Manzie, Jonathan Clark, John Martin, Masako Dunn
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dental rehabilitation has a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction of the jaw. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology allows for precise and timely delivery of an implant-retained dental prosthesis. This study characterizes the cost to produce a point of care (in-house) 3D-printed resin dental prostheses for patients undergoing osseous free flap reconstruction. METHODOLOGY: Implant-retained dental prostheses for patients undergoing osseous free flap reconstruction of the maxilla or mandible produced by the Integrated Prosthetics and Reconstruction (IPR) laboratory at Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Hospital between July 2023 and June 2024 were analysed. The costs of producing the prostheses were calculated using a "bottom up" approach where all activities associated with start-up, planning and fabrication were accounted for and unit costs for each activity quantified. Prostheses with incomplete data were excluded. All costs are reported in 2024 as USD. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients met the study inclusion criteria of which the majority (n = 19) underwent mandibular reconstruction. Twelve patients underwent reconstruction for benign disease and 17 patients had the prosthesis placed at the primary reconstruction. The mean cost of producing the dental prosthesis was $861.72 (range: $702.78 - $1032.34). Start-up costs were the highest contributor (mean cost $333.71) per prosthesis, followed by the design/planning phase (mean cost $260.37), and fabrication phase (mean cost $267.64). The overall cost increased with increasing number of implant fixtures and the number of prosthetic units placed. CONCLUSION: VSP and CAD/CAM technology allows for rapid and accessible dental rehabilitation following osseous free flap reconstruction. However, the significant startup costs of these technologies are likely to be a barrier to institutions wanting to introduce point-of-care manufacturing of dental prosthetics.

PubMed
The University of Sydney (AU), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Chris O’Brien Lifehouse (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.