Accounting Information for Environmental Protection Expenditure and Sustainability Risk Screening: Evidence from EU Member States

Reliable accounting information is increasingly important for fiscal transparency and the assessment of sustainability-related public-finance issues. This study examines how harmonised Environmental Protection Expenditure Accounts (EPEAss) can support comparative analysis and preliminary risk screening in the EU public sector. Using EurostatEPEAsA, GDP and population data, the study applies a descriptive comparative design to analyse EU-level trends for 2018–2022, 2022 public-sector expenditure per capita across all 27 Member States, institutional-sector composition and CEPA-based functional allocation. Nominal EU environmental protection expenditure increased by 17.5% between 2018 and 2022, while its share of GDP remained close to 1.9%. Public-sector expenditure per capita varied substantially across Member States, with a median of EUR 314 and a coefficient of variation of 72.8%. Wastewater and waste management accounted for 69.7% of EU environmental protection investment. These patterns should be interpreted in light of accounting scope, institutional arrangements and infrastructure needs rather than as measures of environmental performance or fiscal risk. EPEA can enhance comparability, auditability and functional interpretation, but direct risk assessment requires additional evidence on liabilities, debt, asset condition, regulatory obligations and environmental outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19070489
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting Information for Environmental Protection Expenditure and Sustainability Risk Screening: Evidence from EU Member States

Zoya Ivanova, Radosveta Krasteva-Hristova
Journal of risk and financial management
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
article

Accounting Information for Environmental Protection Expenditure and Sustainability Risk Screening: Evidence from EU Member States

Zoya Ivanova, Radosveta Krasteva-Hristova
article en

Abstract

Reliable accounting information is increasingly important for fiscal transparency and the assessment of sustainability-related public-finance issues. This study examines how harmonised Environmental Protection Expenditure Accounts (EPEAss) can support comparative analysis and preliminary risk screening in the EU public sector. Using EurostatEPEAsA, GDP and population data, the study applies a descriptive comparative design to analyse EU-level trends for 2018–2022, 2022 public-sector expenditure per capita across all 27 Member States, institutional-sector composition and CEPA-based functional allocation. Nominal EU environmental protection expenditure increased by 17.5% between 2018 and 2022, while its share of GDP remained close to 1.9%. Public-sector expenditure per capita varied substantially across Member States, with a median of EUR 314 and a coefficient of variation of 72.8%. Wastewater and waste management accounted for 69.7% of EU environmental protection investment. These patterns should be interpreted in light of accounting scope, institutional arrangements and infrastructure needs rather than as measures of environmental performance or fiscal risk. EPEA can enhance comparability, auditability and functional interpretation, but direct risk assessment requires additional evidence on liabilities, debt, asset condition, regulatory obligations and environmental outcomes.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 19(7)
D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.