Factors Associated With Optimal Patient‐Clinician Communication Among Cancer Survivors

INTRODUCTION: Patient-clinician communication impacts the well-being and medical outcomes of cancer survivors. However, there is a gap in current literature regarding patient-specific factors influencing optimal communication between people with cancer and their clinicians. METHODS: To better understand factors associated with optimal clinician communication among cancer survivors, survey responses from the Health Information National Trends Survey Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 1123 cancer survivors responding to the survey, 46% (n = 518) were males, 87% identified as white (n = 973), and the average age was 71 years. Patient-clinician communication was reported to be best when patients asked questions (73%) and poorest when dealing with feelings of uncertainty (47%). Descriptive analyses demonstrated differences in selected communication domains among Hispanic participants and racial minority groups. However, race and ethnicity were not independently associated with patient-clinician communication in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Higher educational attainment and shorter time since diagnosis were associated with optimal patient-clinician communication experiences. Descriptive analyses suggested differences in overall communication score distributions across racial and ethnic groups; however, race and ethnicity were not independently associated with patient-clinician communication in adjusted analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.72073
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Associated With Optimal Patient‐Clinician Communication Among Cancer Survivors

Kues, Alique Topalian, Catherine G. Pratt, Melinda Butsch Kovacic et al.
Cancer Medicine
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Factors Associated With Optimal Patient‐Clinician Communication Among Cancer Survivors

Kues, Alique Topalian, Catherine G. Pratt, Melinda Butsch Kovacic, Sofia Wagemaker Viana, Shesh Nath Rai, Robert M. Van Haren, Jenna N. Whitrock, Jianmin Pan, Christina Pinkston, Keilan Johnson
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patient-clinician communication impacts the well-being and medical outcomes of cancer survivors. However, there is a gap in current literature regarding patient-specific factors influencing optimal communication between people with cancer and their clinicians. METHODS: To better understand factors associated with optimal clinician communication among cancer survivors, survey responses from the Health Information National Trends Survey Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 1123 cancer survivors responding to the survey, 46% (n = 518) were males, 87% identified as white (n = 973), and the average age was 71 years. Patient-clinician communication was reported to be best when patients asked questions (73%) and poorest when dealing with feelings of uncertainty (47%). Descriptive analyses demonstrated differences in selected communication domains among Hispanic participants and racial minority groups. However, race and ethnicity were not independently associated with patient-clinician communication in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Higher educational attainment and shorter time since diagnosis were associated with optimal patient-clinician communication experiences. Descriptive analyses suggested differences in overall communication score distributions across racial and ethnic groups; however, race and ethnicity were not independently associated with patient-clinician communication in adjusted analyses.

Cancer MedicineVol. 15(7)
University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.