A Diagnostic System Dynamics Framework for the Analysis of Stakeholder Perception Asymmetries in Multi-Actor Governance Systems: Evidence from Tourism Business Management

Tourism destinations operate as multi-actor governance environments in which stakeholders interpret sustainability initiatives differently, reflecting their distinct institutional roles. This study applies a diagnostic system dynamics perspective to examine perception asymmetries among governance actors, tourism and hospitality professionals, and local community members across Greek tourism destinations. Drawing on survey data from 466 respondents, one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) comparisons across four perception domains reveal a consistent pattern: stakeholder evaluations differ significantly for HR sustainability practices (F = 114.60, p < 0.001) and organisational support conditions (F = 21.29, p < 0.001), while remaining broadly aligned in assessments of overall sustainability outcomes (F = 0.15, p = 0.861). Interpreted through causal loop reasoning, this is consistent with divergence at the implementation level alongside shared strategic orientations. This combination may be interpreted as indicative of feedback asymmetry together with alignment in outcomes, and carries implications for coordination and institutional trust. The study positions stakeholder perception analysis within the problem-structuring stage of the system dynamics modelling cycle, showing how observed perception patterns may be used to identify areas warranting subsequent system dynamics modelling. In this way, it advances a diagnostic framework applicable to multi-actor governance contexts beyond tourism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14070754
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Diagnostic System Dynamics Framework for the Analysis of Stakeholder Perception Asymmetries in Multi-Actor Governance Systems: Evidence from Tourism Business Management

Ioannis Valachis, Sofoklis Skoultsos
Systems
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

A Diagnostic System Dynamics Framework for the Analysis of Stakeholder Perception Asymmetries in Multi-Actor Governance Systems: Evidence from Tourism Business Management

Ioannis Valachis, Sofoklis Skoultsos
article en

Abstract

Tourism destinations operate as multi-actor governance environments in which stakeholders interpret sustainability initiatives differently, reflecting their distinct institutional roles. This study applies a diagnostic system dynamics perspective to examine perception asymmetries among governance actors, tourism and hospitality professionals, and local community members across Greek tourism destinations. Drawing on survey data from 466 respondents, one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) comparisons across four perception domains reveal a consistent pattern: stakeholder evaluations differ significantly for HR sustainability practices (F = 114.60, p < 0.001) and organisational support conditions (F = 21.29, p < 0.001), while remaining broadly aligned in assessments of overall sustainability outcomes (F = 0.15, p = 0.861). Interpreted through causal loop reasoning, this is consistent with divergence at the implementation level alongside shared strategic orientations. This combination may be interpreted as indicative of feedback asymmetry together with alignment in outcomes, and carries implications for coordination and institutional trust. The study positions stakeholder perception analysis within the problem-structuring stage of the system dynamics modelling cycle, showing how observed perception patterns may be used to identify areas warranting subsequent system dynamics modelling. In this way, it advances a diagnostic framework applicable to multi-actor governance contexts beyond tourism.

SystemsVol. 14(7)
Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.