Blood Pressure Variability in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Current Evidence, Measurement Challenges, and Future Directions

Blood pressure variability (BPV) has emerged as a prognostic hemodynamic marker in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), with observational studies consistently associating early systolic fluctuations with infarct progression, neurological deterioration, hemorrhagic transformation, and worse functional outcomes. Whether BPV directly mediates injury or primarily reflects underlying stroke severity and physiological instability remains uncertain. Biologically plausible mechanisms exist in the context of impaired cerebral autoregulation, where systemic pressure fluctuations may translate into cerebral perfusion instability, particularly in the ischemic penumbra and during reperfusion. Despite consistent associations, clinical interpretation of BPV is limited by substantial heterogeneity in measurement methods, monitoring frequency, and analytic approaches. Most studies derive BPV from intermittently sampled oscillometric measurements, which may miss rapid fluctuations and are susceptible to artifacts. BPV is also strongly influenced by stroke severity, treatment intensity, and hemodynamic interventions, raising the possibility that observed variability reflects disease burden rather than an independent injury mechanism. This review summarizes evidence linking BPV to outcomes in AIS, examines methodological variability in its measurement, and highlights limitations restricting its translation into standardized monitoring or therapeutic strategies. BPV should be interpreted as a prognostic marker of disease severity rather than a confirmed causal mediator of injury, and its role as a modifiable treatment target remains unestablished. The HOPE randomized trial provided the first evidence that a reperfusion-guided, individualized systolic BP strategy may improve functional outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), though findings require confirmation in larger trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.70322
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood Pressure Variability in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Current Evidence, Measurement Challenges, and Future Directions

Rachel Aubert, Parth Upadhyaya, Hira Pervez, M AZ Ayub et al.
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
article

Blood Pressure Variability in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Current Evidence, Measurement Challenges, and Future Directions

Rachel Aubert, Parth Upadhyaya, Hira Pervez, M AZ Ayub, Rakesh Shetty Rajalbandi, Chail Shah, DaiWai Olson
article en

Abstract

Blood pressure variability (BPV) has emerged as a prognostic hemodynamic marker in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), with observational studies consistently associating early systolic fluctuations with infarct progression, neurological deterioration, hemorrhagic transformation, and worse functional outcomes. Whether BPV directly mediates injury or primarily reflects underlying stroke severity and physiological instability remains uncertain. Biologically plausible mechanisms exist in the context of impaired cerebral autoregulation, where systemic pressure fluctuations may translate into cerebral perfusion instability, particularly in the ischemic penumbra and during reperfusion. Despite consistent associations, clinical interpretation of BPV is limited by substantial heterogeneity in measurement methods, monitoring frequency, and analytic approaches. Most studies derive BPV from intermittently sampled oscillometric measurements, which may miss rapid fluctuations and are susceptible to artifacts. BPV is also strongly influenced by stroke severity, treatment intensity, and hemodynamic interventions, raising the possibility that observed variability reflects disease burden rather than an independent injury mechanism. This review summarizes evidence linking BPV to outcomes in AIS, examines methodological variability in its measurement, and highlights limitations restricting its translation into standardized monitoring or therapeutic strategies. BPV should be interpreted as a prognostic marker of disease severity rather than a confirmed causal mediator of injury, and its role as a modifiable treatment target remains unestablished. The HOPE randomized trial provided the first evidence that a reperfusion-guided, individualized systolic BP strategy may improve functional outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), though findings require confirmation in larger trials.

Journal of Clinical HypertensionVol. 28(7)
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.