The Rise of Nerve Transfers

BACKGROUND: Nerve transfers have been heralded as a "quantum leap" in peripheral nerve surgery, fundamentally altering the reconstructive paradigm over the past 2 decades. This study analyzed national trends in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) management, tracking specialty-specific adoption of nerve transfers and comparing 30-day postoperative outcomes with traditional reconstruction. METHODS: Data were extracted from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2006 to 2022). Adult patients (18 years or older) with a primary BPI diagnosis, who underwent nerve reconstruction, were included. Cases were categorized by the presence of a nerve transfer using CPT code 64905. Analyses included descriptive statistics, standardized mean differences, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 544 BPI patients, 80 underwent reconstruction involving a nerve transfer. Plastic surgeons performed 60% of nerve transfers despite accounting for only 33.5% of all BPI reconstructions. Neurosurgeons had the lowest overall nerve transfer utilization but increased to a rate matching orthopedic surgeons in the final 4 years. Nerve transfers were associated with lower 30-day complication rates than traditional reconstruction (2.5% vs. 11%, P=0.034), despite being performed on patients with higher preoperative morbidity risk. In multivariable analysis, orthopedic and neurosurgeons remained significantly less likely than plastic surgeons to perform nerve transfers (OR: 0.26, P<0.001; OR: 0.18, P<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Nerve transfer use in BPI reconstruction has increased steadily, with a recent increase among neurosurgeons. Despite being used in higher-risk patients, nerve transfers were associated with significantly lower short-term complication rates. These findings support continued adoption of nerve transfers and highlight their favorable safety profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000004815
Primary Topic
Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Rise of Nerve Transfers

Shelley S. Noland, Megan L. Anderson, Pooja Dhupati, Jonathan Jeger et al.
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
article

The Rise of Nerve Transfers

Shelley S. Noland, Megan L. Anderson, Pooja Dhupati, Jonathan Jeger, Olachi Oleru, Sunny Vansdadia, Camryn S. Payne
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nerve transfers have been heralded as a "quantum leap" in peripheral nerve surgery, fundamentally altering the reconstructive paradigm over the past 2 decades. This study analyzed national trends in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) management, tracking specialty-specific adoption of nerve transfers and comparing 30-day postoperative outcomes with traditional reconstruction. METHODS: Data were extracted from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2006 to 2022). Adult patients (18 years or older) with a primary BPI diagnosis, who underwent nerve reconstruction, were included. Cases were categorized by the presence of a nerve transfer using CPT code 64905. Analyses included descriptive statistics, standardized mean differences, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 544 BPI patients, 80 underwent reconstruction involving a nerve transfer. Plastic surgeons performed 60% of nerve transfers despite accounting for only 33.5% of all BPI reconstructions. Neurosurgeons had the lowest overall nerve transfer utilization but increased to a rate matching orthopedic surgeons in the final 4 years. Nerve transfers were associated with lower 30-day complication rates than traditional reconstruction (2.5% vs. 11%, P=0.034), despite being performed on patients with higher preoperative morbidity risk. In multivariable analysis, orthopedic and neurosurgeons remained significantly less likely than plastic surgeons to perform nerve transfers (OR: 0.26, P<0.001; OR: 0.18, P<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Nerve transfer use in BPI reconstruction has increased steadily, with a recent increase among neurosurgeons. Despite being used in higher-risk patients, nerve transfers were associated with significantly lower short-term complication rates. These findings support continued adoption of nerve transfers and highlight their favorable safety profile.

Annals of Plastic Surgery
University of Arizona (US), University of Phoenix (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.