Improved Diagnostic Certainty of Photon-Counting CT Myelography Compared with Energy-Integrating CT for CSF-Venous Fistulas in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension

<h3>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:</h3> Photon-counting detector CT myelography (PCD-CTM) offers higher spatial resolution than energy-integrating detector CT myelography (EID-CTM), and preliminary studies have shown improved CSF-venous fistula (CVF) conspicuity in spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). We compared CVF detection between PCD-CTM and EID-CTM using the Duke CSF-Venous Fistula Confidence Score (DCCS) in a large SIH cohort. <h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS:</h3> This retrospective study included 628 CTM examinations in 456 patients (63.2% women; mean age, 58.0 years) evaluated for SIH (2020–2025). Two neuroradiologists scored each examination using the DCCS (0 to 3) with consensus adjudication. CVF detection (DCCS ≥2) was compared between PCD-CTM (<i>n</i> = 148) and EID-CTM (<i>n</i> = 480). <h3>RESULTS:</h3> PCD-CTM demonstrated a significant shift toward higher DCCS scores compared with EID-CTM (<i>P</i> = .006), with 66% greater odds of a higher DCCS category on ordinal logistic regression (OR 1.66; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.36; <i>P</i> = .005). Overall CVF detection was 63.1% (396/628), numerically higher for PCD-CTM (69.6% vs 61.0%; <i>P</i> = .07). <h3>CONCLUSIONS:</h3> PCD-CTM was associated with significantly greater diagnostic certainty compared with EID-CTM as measured by the DCCS. These findings support adopting PCD technology for CVF evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a9507
Primary Topic
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved Diagnostic Certainty of Photon-Counting CT Myelography Compared with Energy-Integrating CT for CSF-Venous Fistulas in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension

Michael D. Malinzak, Ajay A. Madhavan, Jay Willhite, Timothy J. Amrhein et al.
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
article

Improved Diagnostic Certainty of Photon-Counting CT Myelography Compared with Energy-Integrating CT for CSF-Venous Fistulas in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension

Michael D. Malinzak, Ajay A. Madhavan, Jay Willhite, Timothy J. Amrhein, Linda Gray, Peter George Kranz, Daphne Zhu, Soren K. Christensen
article en

Abstract

<h3>BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:</h3> Photon-counting detector CT myelography (PCD-CTM) offers higher spatial resolution than energy-integrating detector CT myelography (EID-CTM), and preliminary studies have shown improved CSF-venous fistula (CVF) conspicuity in spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). We compared CVF detection between PCD-CTM and EID-CTM using the Duke CSF-Venous Fistula Confidence Score (DCCS) in a large SIH cohort. <h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS:</h3> This retrospective study included 628 CTM examinations in 456 patients (63.2% women; mean age, 58.0 years) evaluated for SIH (2020–2025). Two neuroradiologists scored each examination using the DCCS (0 to 3) with consensus adjudication. CVF detection (DCCS ≥2) was compared between PCD-CTM (<i>n</i> = 148) and EID-CTM (<i>n</i> = 480). <h3>RESULTS:</h3> PCD-CTM demonstrated a significant shift toward higher DCCS scores compared with EID-CTM (<i>P</i> = .006), with 66% greater odds of a higher DCCS category on ordinal logistic regression (OR 1.66; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.36; <i>P</i> = .005). Overall CVF detection was 63.1% (396/628), numerically higher for PCD-CTM (69.6% vs 61.0%; <i>P</i> = .07). <h3>CONCLUSIONS:</h3> PCD-CTM was associated with significantly greater diagnostic certainty compared with EID-CTM as measured by the DCCS. These findings support adopting PCD technology for CVF evaluation.

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Duke University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.