Beyond Polycotton: How Other Fibers Affect the HCl-Based Polycotton Recycling Process

With the increasing generation of textile waste, efficient chemical recycling methods are urgently needed. This study evaluates a hydrochloric acid-based process for recycling polycotton textiles (polyester/cotton blends), in which cotton is selectively hydrolyzed and converted into 5-(chloromethyl)furfural (CMF), while polyester is recovered. The impact of common non-polycotton fiber contaminants on process performance and product quality was systematically assessed. Cellulose-based fibers did not hinder the process and are suitable for CMF production, while most synthetic fibers were effectively removed without affecting the CMF yield. In contrast, animal fibers reduced the CMF yield and complicated acid recovery, indicating they should be avoided in the feedstocks. Additionally, polyacrylonitrile and wool persisted in the solid fraction, contaminating the recovered polyester and lowering its value. To improve process robustness and product quality, intermediate filtration and extended hydrolysis time are recommended. These findings highlight critical feedstock requirements and operational adjustments for scalable polycotton recycling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Textiles
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles6030079
Primary Topic
Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Polycotton: How Other Fibers Affect the HCl-Based Polycotton Recycling Process

Gert‐Jan M. Gruter, Nienke Leenders, G.P.M. Van Klink
Textiles
Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
article

Beyond Polycotton: How Other Fibers Affect the HCl-Based Polycotton Recycling Process

Gert‐Jan M. Gruter, Nienke Leenders, G.P.M. Van Klink
article en

Abstract

With the increasing generation of textile waste, efficient chemical recycling methods are urgently needed. This study evaluates a hydrochloric acid-based process for recycling polycotton textiles (polyester/cotton blends), in which cotton is selectively hydrolyzed and converted into 5-(chloromethyl)furfural (CMF), while polyester is recovered. The impact of common non-polycotton fiber contaminants on process performance and product quality was systematically assessed. Cellulose-based fibers did not hinder the process and are suitable for CMF production, while most synthetic fibers were effectively removed without affecting the CMF yield. In contrast, animal fibers reduced the CMF yield and complicated acid recovery, indicating they should be avoided in the feedstocks. Additionally, polyacrylonitrile and wool persisted in the solid fraction, contaminating the recovered polyester and lowering its value. To improve process robustness and product quality, intermediate filtration and extended hydrolysis time are recommended. These findings highlight critical feedstock requirements and operational adjustments for scalable polycotton recycling.

TextilesVol. 6(3)
Avantium (Netherlands) (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.