Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance: organized hypocrisy or balancing contradictory demands?

Purpose This study aims to investigate the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement and tax avoidance, exploring whether firms engage in “organized hypocrisy” – leveraging CSR initiatives to maintain legitimacy while simultaneously engaging in aggressive tax planning. The study further examines the moderating effects of institutional environments and industry characteristics. Design/methodology/approach Using a panel data set of firms from 12 countries over the period 2006–2019, this study applies fixed-effects regression models to assess the relationship between CSR engagement and tax avoidance. Multiple robustness tests, including alternative measures of CSR and tax avoidance as well as two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimation, ensure the reliability of results. Findings The authors find that higher CSR engagement is associated with greater tax avoidance. The relationship is shaped by institutional and industry contexts: it is stronger for firms in liberal market economies and in environmentally sensitive industries. These findings remain robust to alternative measures of CSR and tax avoidance and to tests including or excluding US firms. Practical implications The findings have implications for policymakers, regulators and standard setters, highlighting the need to enhance transparency in CSR disclosures and corporate tax policies. Strengthening regulatory frameworks may help curb opportunistic CSR practices used to justify aggressive tax planning. Social implications The study underscores the potential societal consequences of firms using CSR engagement to obscure tax avoidance strategies. By diverting financial resources from public funds to shareholders, such practices may undermine government revenues needed for essential public services and infrastructure development. Originality/value This study contributes novel empirical evidence to the literature by demonstrating how firms simultaneously engage in CSR and tax avoidance, extending the concept of organized hypocrisy to corporate tax policy. By incorporating cross-country data, it provides a broader institutional perspective on the relationship between CSR and tax behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of financial reporting & accounting
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-10-2025-0827
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance: organized hypocrisy or balancing contradictory demands?

Abdullah Alsaadi, Aziz Jaafar, Muhammed‐Shahid Ebrahim, Doris Merkl-Davies
Journal of financial reporting & accounting
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance: organized hypocrisy or balancing contradictory demands?

Abdullah Alsaadi, Aziz Jaafar, Muhammed‐Shahid Ebrahim, Doris Merkl-Davies
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement and tax avoidance, exploring whether firms engage in “organized hypocrisy” – leveraging CSR initiatives to maintain legitimacy while simultaneously engaging in aggressive tax planning. The study further examines the moderating effects of institutional environments and industry characteristics. Design/methodology/approach Using a panel data set of firms from 12 countries over the period 2006–2019, this study applies fixed-effects regression models to assess the relationship between CSR engagement and tax avoidance. Multiple robustness tests, including alternative measures of CSR and tax avoidance as well as two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimation, ensure the reliability of results. Findings The authors find that higher CSR engagement is associated with greater tax avoidance. The relationship is shaped by institutional and industry contexts: it is stronger for firms in liberal market economies and in environmentally sensitive industries. These findings remain robust to alternative measures of CSR and tax avoidance and to tests including or excluding US firms. Practical implications The findings have implications for policymakers, regulators and standard setters, highlighting the need to enhance transparency in CSR disclosures and corporate tax policies. Strengthening regulatory frameworks may help curb opportunistic CSR practices used to justify aggressive tax planning. Social implications The study underscores the potential societal consequences of firms using CSR engagement to obscure tax avoidance strategies. By diverting financial resources from public funds to shareholders, such practices may undermine government revenues needed for essential public services and infrastructure development. Originality/value This study contributes novel empirical evidence to the literature by demonstrating how firms simultaneously engage in CSR and tax avoidance, extending the concept of organized hypocrisy to corporate tax policy. By incorporating cross-country data, it provides a broader institutional perspective on the relationship between CSR and tax behavior.

Journal of financial reporting & accounting
Bangor University (GB), Durham University (GB), Umm al-Qura University (SA), University of Sharjah (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.