Adjuvant Pembrolizumab plus Belzutifan for Renal-Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant pembrolizumab improves disease-free and overall survival among patients with resected clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. The hypoxia-inducible factor 2α inhibitor belzutifan has activity in advanced disease. Adjuvant pembrolizumab with belzutifan may further improve outcomes in patients with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at increased risk for recurrence. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous pembrolizumab at a dose of 400 mg every 6 weeks (≤9 doses) and either daily oral belzutifan at a dose of 120 mg (pembrolizumab-belzutifan) or placebo (pembrolizumab-placebo) for up to 1 year. The primary end point was disease-free survival as assessed by the investigator; secondary end points included overall survival and safety. RESULTS: A total of 921 participants were assigned to receive pembrolizumab-belzutifan and 920 were assigned to receive pembrolizumab-placebo. The median time from randomization to the data-cutoff date (August 23, 2025) was 28.4 months (range, 15.0 to 40.1). Disease-free survival was significantly higher with pembrolizumab-belzutifan than with pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.87; two-sided P<0.001); the estimated 24-month disease-free survival was 80.7% and 73.7%, respectively. At this interim analysis with 29% of the final-analysis events observed, overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups (hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.19; two-sided P = 0.24); the estimated 24-month overall survival was 96.2% with pembrolizumab-belzutifan and 95.7% with pembrolizumab-placebo. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 52.1% of the participants who received pembrolizumab-belzutifan and in 30.2% of those who received pembrolizumab-placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with pembrolizumab-belzutifan led to significantly higher disease-free survival, with a greater risk of grade 3 or higher toxic effects, than treatment with pembrolizumab monotherapy after nephrectomy in participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at increased risk for recurrence. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck [Rahway, NJ]; LITESPARK-022 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05239728.).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2518245
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adjuvant Pembrolizumab plus Belzutifan for Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Christian Caglevic, Jad Chahoud, Wesley Yip, Robert G. Uzzo et al.
New England Journal of Medicine
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Adjuvant Pembrolizumab plus Belzutifan for Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Christian Caglevic, Jad Chahoud, Wesley Yip, Robert G. Uzzo, Juan Carlos Vázquez Limón, Joseph E. Burgents, Manish Sharma, Toni K. Choueiri, Elena Verzoni, Roberto Iacovelli, Yüksel Ürün, Cristina Suárez, Thomas B. Powles, Balaji Venugopal, Yu‐Cheng Chang, J H Karam, Tom Ferguson, Carlos Rojas, Jae Lyun Lee, Hideaki Miyake, Rana R. McKay, Camillo Porta, Hans Hammers, Robert J. Motzer, Hong Liu, Dingwei Ye, Zhisong He
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant pembrolizumab improves disease-free and overall survival among patients with resected clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. The hypoxia-inducible factor 2α inhibitor belzutifan has activity in advanced disease. Adjuvant pembrolizumab with belzutifan may further improve outcomes in patients with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at increased risk for recurrence. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous pembrolizumab at a dose of 400 mg every 6 weeks (≤9 doses) and either daily oral belzutifan at a dose of 120 mg (pembrolizumab-belzutifan) or placebo (pembrolizumab-placebo) for up to 1 year. The primary end point was disease-free survival as assessed by the investigator; secondary end points included overall survival and safety. RESULTS: A total of 921 participants were assigned to receive pembrolizumab-belzutifan and 920 were assigned to receive pembrolizumab-placebo. The median time from randomization to the data-cutoff date (August 23, 2025) was 28.4 months (range, 15.0 to 40.1). Disease-free survival was significantly higher with pembrolizumab-belzutifan than with pembrolizumab-placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.87; two-sided P<0.001); the estimated 24-month disease-free survival was 80.7% and 73.7%, respectively. At this interim analysis with 29% of the final-analysis events observed, overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups (hazard ratio for death, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.19; two-sided P = 0.24); the estimated 24-month overall survival was 96.2% with pembrolizumab-belzutifan and 95.7% with pembrolizumab-placebo. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 52.1% of the participants who received pembrolizumab-belzutifan and in 30.2% of those who received pembrolizumab-placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with pembrolizumab-belzutifan led to significantly higher disease-free survival, with a greater risk of grade 3 or higher toxic effects, than treatment with pembrolizumab monotherapy after nephrectomy in participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at increased risk for recurrence. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck [Rahway, NJ]; LITESPARK-022 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05239728.).

New England Journal of MedicineVol. 395(1)
Ulsan College (KR), Hebron University (PS), Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), Ankara University (TR), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Peking University (CN), Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre (GB), Fiona Stanley Hospital (AU), Asan Medical Center (KR), Clínica Alemana (CL), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (JP), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), University of California San Diego (US), University of Ulsan (KR), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Azienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Consorziale - Policlinico Bari (IT), City of Hope (US), Finis Terrae University (CL), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Hospital Civil de Guadalajara (MX), Temple University Health System (US), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Peking University First Hospital (CN), Clínica MEDS (Chile) (CL), Fundación Arturo López Pérez (CL), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), University of Glasgow (GB), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Merck Sharp and Dohme
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.