Contemplative Literacy in the Age of GenAI: Embodied Reading, Empathy, and the Limits of Detection

Abstract: This study examines how contemplative literacy practices inform student attitudes toward AI-generated texts and explores the paradoxical relationship between embodied reading and GenAI detection. As generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into writing instruction, educators face fundamental questions about the value of human authorship and the role of reading in a post-literate landscape. Drawing on contemplative pedagogy frameworks and theories of powerful literacy, the research presented here, conducted during the 2025 Fall Semester, investigates whether students can distinguish between human and GenAI-authored texts and how their disciplinary training shapes their attitudes toward the labor value of literacy. The results were perhaps surprising: first-year students demonstrated superior GenAI detection accuracy while upper-level students showed significantly stronger investment in human authorship value.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œCEA critic/CEA critic
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/cea.2026.a994419
Primary Topic
Literacy, Media, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contemplative Literacy in the Age of GenAI: Embodied Reading, Empathy, and the Limits of Detection

Christian Smith
˜The œCEA critic/CEA critic
Literacy, Media, and Education
article

Contemplative Literacy in the Age of GenAI: Embodied Reading, Empathy, and the Limits of Detection

Christian Smith
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This study examines how contemplative literacy practices inform student attitudes toward AI-generated texts and explores the paradoxical relationship between embodied reading and GenAI detection. As generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into writing instruction, educators face fundamental questions about the value of human authorship and the role of reading in a post-literate landscape. Drawing on contemplative pedagogy frameworks and theories of powerful literacy, the research presented here, conducted during the 2025 Fall Semester, investigates whether students can distinguish between human and GenAI-authored texts and how their disciplinary training shapes their attitudes toward the labor value of literacy. The results were perhaps surprising: first-year students demonstrated superior GenAI detection accuracy while upper-level students showed significantly stronger investment in human authorship value.

˜The œCEA critic/CEA criticVol. 88(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Literacy, Media, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.