Oncologic outcomes after poly-4-hydroxybutyrate scaffold in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a retrospective, multi-center cohort study

BACKGROUND: Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffolds are increasingly used in post-mastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction. Clinical adoption has outpaced evidence regarding oncologic outcomes and recurrence detection in reconstructed breasts. METHODS: We conducted a real-world cohort study via the Guardian Research Network database (2016-2023). Female patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction were identified; 269 P4HB cases were compared with 269 stratified, randomly sampled non-P4HB controls. Primary endpoints were LRR and LRRFS; secondary endpoints included disease-specific and overall survival. Cumulative incidence functions accounted for competing risk of non-breast cancer death. Administrative censoring at 3 years (as well as time aligned cohorts) was used to mitigate temporal imbalance. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 2.2 years in P4HB and 5.5 years in controls, LRR was uncommon (4/269 (1.5%) vs. 6/269 (2.2%)). The 3-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 1.6% in both groups. Disease-specific mortality was rare (0.7% vs. 2.6%). No early signal of differences in locoregional recurrence was observed between groups within the observed follow‑up period. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world, multi-center analysis, no detectable signal of increased locoregional recurrence was observed between cohorts. These findings do not establish evidence of oncologic equivalence, but rather an absence of a detectable early signal of increased risk within the observed follow-up. Larger, time-aligned datasets with plane-stratified surveillance and analyses are warranted to further evaluate oncologic outcomes given the comparator cohort included a greater proportion of earlier-era reconstructions than the P4HB cohort, reflecting more recent clinical adoption of P4HB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04443-y
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oncologic outcomes after poly-4-hydroxybutyrate scaffold in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a retrospective, multi-center cohort study

Kiya Movassaghi, Neil M. Iyengar, Haytham Gareer, Andrea McCracken et al.
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Oncologic outcomes after poly-4-hydroxybutyrate scaffold in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a retrospective, multi-center cohort study

Kiya Movassaghi, Neil M. Iyengar, Haytham Gareer, Andrea McCracken, Nicolás Tentoni, Kimberly Krugman, Julia Tchou, E. Shelley Hwang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffolds are increasingly used in post-mastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction. Clinical adoption has outpaced evidence regarding oncologic outcomes and recurrence detection in reconstructed breasts. METHODS: We conducted a real-world cohort study via the Guardian Research Network database (2016-2023). Female patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction were identified; 269 P4HB cases were compared with 269 stratified, randomly sampled non-P4HB controls. Primary endpoints were LRR and LRRFS; secondary endpoints included disease-specific and overall survival. Cumulative incidence functions accounted for competing risk of non-breast cancer death. Administrative censoring at 3 years (as well as time aligned cohorts) was used to mitigate temporal imbalance. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 2.2 years in P4HB and 5.5 years in controls, LRR was uncommon (4/269 (1.5%) vs. 6/269 (2.2%)). The 3-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 1.6% in both groups. Disease-specific mortality was rare (0.7% vs. 2.6%). No early signal of differences in locoregional recurrence was observed between groups within the observed follow‑up period. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world, multi-center analysis, no detectable signal of increased locoregional recurrence was observed between cohorts. These findings do not establish evidence of oncologic equivalence, but rather an absence of a detectable early signal of increased risk within the observed follow-up. Larger, time-aligned datasets with plane-stratified surveillance and analyses are warranted to further evaluate oncologic outcomes given the comparator cohort included a greater proportion of earlier-era reconstructions than the P4HB cohort, reflecting more recent clinical adoption of P4HB.

World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Becton Dickinson (United States) (US), Emory University (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Duke University (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Research Network (United States) (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Memphis (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.