Region-Specific Evaluation of Plaque Segmentation in Cross-sectional Projections of Carotid Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning Models in a Sub-clinical Atherosclerosis Cohort

OBJECTIVE: Detection of atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid arteries is essential for early cardiovascular risk assessment. While B-mode ultrasound is the standard imaging modality, most deep learning studies focus on longitudinal views of the common carotid artery, with limited investigation of cross-sectional imaging and other clinically relevant regions such as the carotid bulb and split. To the best of our knowledge, this study presents the first region-specific evaluation of plaque segmentation using deep learning models in cross-sectional carotid ultrasound images. METHODS: Cross-sectional carotid ultrasound images from the 6 y follow-up of the population-based VIPVIZA cohort were analyzed. Two segmentation configurations were investigated: Case 1, where plaque segmentation was performed directly on the full field of view, and Case 2, where segmentation was guided by artery-centered regions of interest (ROIs) derived from manual ground truth annotations. Six deep learning architectures were evaluated: YOLOv8, U-Net, Attention U-Net, U-Net++, Swin U-Net and DeepLabV3. All images were pre-processed using intensity normalization and contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization to enhance boundary visibility. RESULTS: In the full field of view configuration (Case 1), DeepLabV3 achieved the highest overall Dice score (0.65), followed by Swin U-Net (Dice = 0.64) and U-Net++ (Dice = 0.62), while YOLOv8 and Attention U-Net showed comparable performance (Dice = 0.61). In the ROI-based configuration (Case 2), U-Net achieved the highest segmentation performance in the common carotid artery (Dice = 0.73), while YOLOv8 achieved the best performance in the carotid bulb (Dice = 0.66). In the carotid split region, U-Net++ achieved the highest Dice score (0.87), followed closely by DeepLabV3 (Dice = 0.86) and Attention U-Net (Dice = 0.84). CONCLUSION: Region-specific results from this study support the development of automated plaque segmentation in cross-sectional carotid ultrasound imaging. The findings highlight the importance of anatomical guidance and demonstrate that ROI-based approaches substantially improve segmentation performance. DeepLabV3 and transformer-based models show strong potential in full-image settings, while U-Net-based architectures remain highly effective at ROI-based segmentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.05.029
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Region-Specific Evaluation of Plaque Segmentation in Cross-sectional Projections of Carotid Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning Models in a Sub-clinical Atherosclerosis Cohort

Nils Östlund, Karolina Jonzén, Arash Saboori, Marko Nygård et al.
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Region-Specific Evaluation of Plaque Segmentation in Cross-sectional Projections of Carotid Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning Models in a Sub-clinical Atherosclerosis Cohort

Nils Östlund, Karolina Jonzén, Arash Saboori, Marko Nygård, Fredrik Öhberg, Göran Mannberg, C Gronlund, Jakob Marklund
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Detection of atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid arteries is essential for early cardiovascular risk assessment. While B-mode ultrasound is the standard imaging modality, most deep learning studies focus on longitudinal views of the common carotid artery, with limited investigation of cross-sectional imaging and other clinically relevant regions such as the carotid bulb and split. To the best of our knowledge, this study presents the first region-specific evaluation of plaque segmentation using deep learning models in cross-sectional carotid ultrasound images. METHODS: Cross-sectional carotid ultrasound images from the 6 y follow-up of the population-based VIPVIZA cohort were analyzed. Two segmentation configurations were investigated: Case 1, where plaque segmentation was performed directly on the full field of view, and Case 2, where segmentation was guided by artery-centered regions of interest (ROIs) derived from manual ground truth annotations. Six deep learning architectures were evaluated: YOLOv8, U-Net, Attention U-Net, U-Net++, Swin U-Net and DeepLabV3. All images were pre-processed using intensity normalization and contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization to enhance boundary visibility. RESULTS: In the full field of view configuration (Case 1), DeepLabV3 achieved the highest overall Dice score (0.65), followed by Swin U-Net (Dice = 0.64) and U-Net++ (Dice = 0.62), while YOLOv8 and Attention U-Net showed comparable performance (Dice = 0.61). In the ROI-based configuration (Case 2), U-Net achieved the highest segmentation performance in the common carotid artery (Dice = 0.73), while YOLOv8 achieved the best performance in the carotid bulb (Dice = 0.66). In the carotid split region, U-Net++ achieved the highest Dice score (0.87), followed closely by DeepLabV3 (Dice = 0.86) and Attention U-Net (Dice = 0.84). CONCLUSION: Region-specific results from this study support the development of automated plaque segmentation in cross-sectional carotid ultrasound imaging. The findings highlight the importance of anatomical guidance and demonstrate that ROI-based approaches substantially improve segmentation performance. DeepLabV3 and transformer-based models show strong potential in full-image settings, while U-Net-based architectures remain highly effective at ROI-based segmentation.

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Centre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics (SE), Umeå University (SE)
Västerbotten Läns Landsting, Umeå Universitet, Kempestiftelserna
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.