Between Democracy and Authoritarianism: Insights from the Anthropology of Democracy

This article traces democracy from a time of universal optimism to today's moment of democratic decline to show how anthropology is particularly well positioned to understand the relationship between democracy and authoritarianism, not only as opposing forces, but also as interconnected political processes. Anthropological approaches to democracy rest on two key analytical distinctions: first, treating politics as a process and, second, separating democratic structures from democratic values to examine how people bridge the inevitable divide they encounter between democratic structures and values. The article highlights three bodies of literature—transitions to democracy, citizenship, and social movements—to show how the marketization and technicalization of politics, the centralization of power, and systems for the allocation of rights lay bare the ways that democratic structures can impede democratic values, as well as how people continue to pursue democratic values, even in the absence or decline of democratic structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041624-034935
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Democracy and Authoritarianism: Insights from the Anthropology of Democracy

Marianne Maeckelbergh
Annual Review of Anthropology
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

Between Democracy and Authoritarianism: Insights from the Anthropology of Democracy

Marianne Maeckelbergh
article en

Abstract

This article traces democracy from a time of universal optimism to today's moment of democratic decline to show how anthropology is particularly well positioned to understand the relationship between democracy and authoritarianism, not only as opposing forces, but also as interconnected political processes. Anthropological approaches to democracy rest on two key analytical distinctions: first, treating politics as a process and, second, separating democratic structures from democratic values to examine how people bridge the inevitable divide they encounter between democratic structures and values. The article highlights three bodies of literature—transitions to democracy, citizenship, and social movements—to show how the marketization and technicalization of politics, the centralization of power, and systems for the allocation of rights lay bare the ways that democratic structures can impede democratic values, as well as how people continue to pursue democratic values, even in the absence or decline of democratic structures.

Annual Review of Anthropology
Ghent University (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between Democracy and Authoritarianism: Insights from the Anthropology of Democracy — Marianne Maeckelbergh · Annual Review of Anthropology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS