Tumor control and cranial nerve outcomes after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for Glomus jugulare tumors: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and institutional failure pattern analysis

Purpose To define tumor control, cranial nerve toxicity, and progression patterns after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for glomus jugulare tumors using a systematic review/meta-analysis and an institutional cohort. Methods and Materials A PRISMA-compliant systematic review identified studies reporting outcomes of GKRS for glomus jugulare tumors. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were performed for radiographic tumor control, tumor shrinkage, new or worsened cranial nerve deficits, and hearing worsening using endpoint-specific denominators. Heterogeneity was quantified with I 2 . Sensitivity analyses excluding the institutional cohort were performed. The institutional jugulare subset contributed to pooled estimates, whereas the full institutional jugulotympanic cohort was analyzed descriptively for progression-free survival, failure pattern, and salvage. Results Twenty-six cohorts were included. Across 590 tumors, pooled radiographic tumor control after GKRS was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.94; I 2 = 0.0%). Across 518 tumors, pooled radiographic shrinkage was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.43–0.59; I 2 = 58.4%). Across 463 patients, pooled new or worsened cranial nerve deficit was 0.11 (95% CI, 0.08–0.14; I 2 = 0.0%). Hearing worsening was reported in a limited subset of 114 evaluable patients, with a pooled proportion of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.10–0.24; I 2 = 0.0%). Sensitivity analyses excluding the institutional cohort did not materially change pooled estimates. In the institutional cohort (n = 27), radiographic control at last follow-up was 85.2%. Kaplan–Meier PFS was 100.0% at 24 months and 77.8% at 60 months. Among 4 progression events, failures were predominantly marginal or out-of-field, with no clearly in-field failures; salvage GKRS was feasible in most recurrent cases. Conclusions GKRS provides durable tumor control with a favorable cranial nerve toxicity profile in glomus jugulare tumors. Treatment response is characterized more by stability than regression. In the institutional cohort, progression events were marginal or out-of-field rather than clearly in-field, supporting GKRS as an effective local-control strategy within the treated target while highlighting the importance of careful target delineation and long-term surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2026.112173
Primary Topic
Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tumor control and cranial nerve outcomes after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for Glomus jugulare tumors: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and institutional failure pattern analysis

Dheerendra Prasad, Aditya Goyal, Lindsay Lipinski, Victor Goulenko et al.
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
article

Tumor control and cranial nerve outcomes after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for Glomus jugulare tumors: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and institutional failure pattern analysis

Dheerendra Prasad, Aditya Goyal, Lindsay Lipinski, Victor Goulenko, Sarthak Sinha, Neil D. Almeida, Andrew J. Fabiano, Venkatesh S. Madhugiri, Rohan Kumar, Rohil Shekher, Robert A. Fenstermaker, Kenneth V Snyder
article en

Abstract

Purpose To define tumor control, cranial nerve toxicity, and progression patterns after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for glomus jugulare tumors using a systematic review/meta-analysis and an institutional cohort. Methods and Materials A PRISMA-compliant systematic review identified studies reporting outcomes of GKRS for glomus jugulare tumors. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were performed for radiographic tumor control, tumor shrinkage, new or worsened cranial nerve deficits, and hearing worsening using endpoint-specific denominators. Heterogeneity was quantified with I 2 . Sensitivity analyses excluding the institutional cohort were performed. The institutional jugulare subset contributed to pooled estimates, whereas the full institutional jugulotympanic cohort was analyzed descriptively for progression-free survival, failure pattern, and salvage. Results Twenty-six cohorts were included. Across 590 tumors, pooled radiographic tumor control after GKRS was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.94; I 2 = 0.0%). Across 518 tumors, pooled radiographic shrinkage was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.43–0.59; I 2 = 58.4%). Across 463 patients, pooled new or worsened cranial nerve deficit was 0.11 (95% CI, 0.08–0.14; I 2 = 0.0%). Hearing worsening was reported in a limited subset of 114 evaluable patients, with a pooled proportion of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.10–0.24; I 2 = 0.0%). Sensitivity analyses excluding the institutional cohort did not materially change pooled estimates. In the institutional cohort (n = 27), radiographic control at last follow-up was 85.2%. Kaplan–Meier PFS was 100.0% at 24 months and 77.8% at 60 months. Among 4 progression events, failures were predominantly marginal or out-of-field, with no clearly in-field failures; salvage GKRS was feasible in most recurrent cases. Conclusions GKRS provides durable tumor control with a favorable cranial nerve toxicity profile in glomus jugulare tumors. Treatment response is characterized more by stability than regression. In the institutional cohort, progression events were marginal or out-of-field rather than clearly in-field, supporting GKRS as an effective local-control strategy within the treated target while highlighting the importance of careful target delineation and long-term surveillance.

Journal of Clinical NeuroscienceVol. 152
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.