Loanwords in Early Modern English borrowed from polysemous French items

In contemporary contexts, monosemous borrowing appears to be the normal case (Winter-Froemel 2014: 73). It was found by Ingham (2021) that the majority outcome in Middle English was for multiple senses of a French etymon to be borrowed, however. The explanation offered was that the context for borrowing in Middle English was one of extensive bilingualism practised by the educated classes. Since that context came to an end after the 14th century, the prediction is made here that polysemous borrowing sharply declined in the Early Modern English period. Two samples of 16th and 17th century loans from French into English are analysed so as to validate this prediction. Data drawn from a comparison of entries in the Dictionnaire du Moyen Français and the OED’s Historical Thesaurus of English show a marked reduction in loan polysemy in this period. It is proposed that the context in which borrowing occurs exerts a decisive influence on the range of senses adopted by the borrowing language. The borrowing process in the EModEng period is hypothesised to have operated by adapting into English items encountered in written form by individuals with a reading ability in French, rather than a communicative setting requiring spoken proficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Neophilologica
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2026.2624798
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Loanwords in Early Modern English borrowed from polysemous French items

Richard Ingham
Studia Neophilologica
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

Loanwords in Early Modern English borrowed from polysemous French items

Richard Ingham
article en

Abstract

In contemporary contexts, monosemous borrowing appears to be the normal case (Winter-Froemel 2014: 73). It was found by Ingham (2021) that the majority outcome in Middle English was for multiple senses of a French etymon to be borrowed, however. The explanation offered was that the context for borrowing in Middle English was one of extensive bilingualism practised by the educated classes. Since that context came to an end after the 14th century, the prediction is made here that polysemous borrowing sharply declined in the Early Modern English period. Two samples of 16th and 17th century loans from French into English are analysed so as to validate this prediction. Data drawn from a comparison of entries in the Dictionnaire du Moyen Français and the OED’s Historical Thesaurus of English show a marked reduction in loan polysemy in this period. It is proposed that the context in which borrowing occurs exerts a decisive influence on the range of senses adopted by the borrowing language. The borrowing process in the EModEng period is hypothesised to have operated by adapting into English items encountered in written form by individuals with a reading ability in French, rather than a communicative setting requiring spoken proficiency.

Studia Neophilologica
University of Westminster (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.