The politics of urban growth and decline

The purpose of this chapter is to explore the literature and arguments that have emerged over the last two decades about the politics of urban policy in Europe and North America. We consider the debates about the emergence of a stronger economic dimension to urban policy and what this means for social cohesion and democracy. We also discuss the significance of policy decentralization and the consequences for different kinds of places and people. We argue that local political processes matter to the social and economic trajectories of cities and that decentralization can be a positive force for prosperity and participation, although it can also be subverted for narrower political purposes and exacerbate inequalities. The structure of the chapter is as follows. The next section considers the economic sources and impacts of recent urban growth. Section two discusses the political processes that contribute to urban success. The third section contrasts different political theories of urban policy. Section four compares different perspectives on developments in Europe and North America. The fifth section examines who benefits from urban policy. The conclusion draws the threads together and outlines some directions for future research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/32847788
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of urban growth and decline

Human Sciences Research Council
Human Science Research Council SA
Urban Planning and Governance
article

The politics of urban growth and decline

Human Sciences Research Council
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to explore the literature and arguments that have emerged over the last two decades about the politics of urban policy in Europe and North America. We consider the debates about the emergence of a stronger economic dimension to urban policy and what this means for social cohesion and democracy. We also discuss the significance of policy decentralization and the consequences for different kinds of places and people. We argue that local political processes matter to the social and economic trajectories of cities and that decentralization can be a positive force for prosperity and participation, although it can also be subverted for narrower political purposes and exacerbate inequalities. The structure of the chapter is as follows. The next section considers the economic sources and impacts of recent urban growth. Section two discusses the political processes that contribute to urban success. The third section contrasts different political theories of urban policy. Section four compares different perspectives on developments in Europe and North America. The fifth section examines who benefits from urban policy. The conclusion draws the threads together and outlines some directions for future research.

Human Science Research Council SA
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The politics of urban growth and decline — Human Sciences Research Council · Human Science Research Council SA (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS