Input Modality Ablation for Sustainable Landslide Hazard Management Using U-Net: Fused DEM–Optical vs. Spectral vs. Terrain Representations in a Small-Sample Pilot Study

Rapid and accurate landslide mapping is essential for disaster risk reduction and sustainable land management in landslide-prone mountainous regions. This study presents a U-Net semantic segmentation framework for pixel-wise landslide classification in the Laonung Creek Watershed of southern Taiwan using 96 annotated tiles derived from a very high-resolution DEM and SPOT-6 multispectral imagery. An input modality ablation experiment compares four configurations: a fused DEM–optical composite matching the visual input used by the annotators (annotation-coherent input), SPOT-6 natural color imagery, a DEM-derived terrain stack, and a six-channel multi-source stack combining all SPOT-6 bands with slope and curvature. All configurations use an identical EfficientNet-B0 U-Net architecture under a spatially blocked train/validation/test design with a fixed held-out test set of 29 tiles. The multi-source stack achieves the highest test Average Precision (AP) of 0.556 (95% CI: 0.463–0.643), whereas the annotation-coherent fused composite achieves AP = 0.511 (95% CI: 0.404–0.601); overlapping confidence intervals indicate that neither modality is definitively superior at this test-set size. The terrain-only configuration (AP = 0.152) confirms that optical information is essential for reliable delineation. A key methodological finding is that differential encoder–decoder learning rates caused rapid decoder overfitting; matched rates of 10−5 substantially stabilized training and are recommended as a conservative default for small-sample segmentation with pretrained encoders. At matched pixel positions, the best DL model achieves AP comparable to a companion Random Forest (DL: 0.847, RF: 0.824), while producing spatially coherent probability maps that support scalable landslide inventory compilation for sustainable hazard management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18136649
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Input Modality Ablation for Sustainable Landslide Hazard Management Using U-Net: Fused DEM–Optical vs. Spectral vs. Terrain Representations in a Small-Sample Pilot Study

Fuan Tsai, Walter Chen
Sustainability
Landslides and related hazards
article

Input Modality Ablation for Sustainable Landslide Hazard Management Using U-Net: Fused DEM–Optical vs. Spectral vs. Terrain Representations in a Small-Sample Pilot Study

Fuan Tsai, Walter Chen
article en

Abstract

Rapid and accurate landslide mapping is essential for disaster risk reduction and sustainable land management in landslide-prone mountainous regions. This study presents a U-Net semantic segmentation framework for pixel-wise landslide classification in the Laonung Creek Watershed of southern Taiwan using 96 annotated tiles derived from a very high-resolution DEM and SPOT-6 multispectral imagery. An input modality ablation experiment compares four configurations: a fused DEM–optical composite matching the visual input used by the annotators (annotation-coherent input), SPOT-6 natural color imagery, a DEM-derived terrain stack, and a six-channel multi-source stack combining all SPOT-6 bands with slope and curvature. All configurations use an identical EfficientNet-B0 U-Net architecture under a spatially blocked train/validation/test design with a fixed held-out test set of 29 tiles. The multi-source stack achieves the highest test Average Precision (AP) of 0.556 (95% CI: 0.463–0.643), whereas the annotation-coherent fused composite achieves AP = 0.511 (95% CI: 0.404–0.601); overlapping confidence intervals indicate that neither modality is definitively superior at this test-set size. The terrain-only configuration (AP = 0.152) confirms that optical information is essential for reliable delineation. A key methodological finding is that differential encoder–decoder learning rates caused rapid decoder overfitting; matched rates of 10−5 substantially stabilized training and are recommended as a conservative default for small-sample segmentation with pretrained encoders. At matched pixel positions, the best DL model achieves AP comparable to a companion Random Forest (DL: 0.847, RF: 0.824), while producing spatially coherent probability maps that support scalable landslide inventory compilation for sustainable hazard management.

SustainabilityVol. 18(13)
National Taipei University of Technology (TW), National Central University (TW)
Ministère de l'Intérieur, National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.