Developmental Stage Shapes Acute Transcriptional Responses to Operational Chemical Euthanasia Formulations in Zebrafish Embryos and Larvae

Chemical euthanasia protocols are routinely applied across zebrafish developmental stages, but the effects of formulation, time exposure, and developmental stage remain unclear and could introduce variability in transcriptional results and interfere with interlaboratory reproducibility of molecular endpoints. Wild-type AB zebrafish were exposed at three developmental windows (6 hpf, gastrulation; 30 hpf, pharyngula; 100 hpf, pre-feeding larva) to three operational euthanasia formulations (clove oil 0.1% v/v, tricaine/MS-222 1 g/L, or lidocaine 1 g/L), for 3, 10, or 25 min. Expression of ten genes covering immediate-early activation, cellular stress, metabolism, neuroendocrine signalling, apoptosis, and inflammation was quantified by qPCR. Expression responses were analysed using a three-way factorial framework including the developmental phase, formulation, and exposure time. The developmental phase explained substantial developmental context in several genes. The Phase × Treatment interaction was significant after global FDR correction for nine of ten genes, whereas treatment main effects did not provide a stable cross-stage ranking of formulations. Descriptively, gene expression varied across formulations and stages, with several Phase III markers showing positive shifts, but no operational formulation showed universally consistent effects after multiple-testing correction, while effect-size magnitudes should be interpreted cautiously. Acute transcriptional responses to operational chemical euthanasia formulations in zebrafish embryos and larvae were context-dependent. Developmental stage, rather than a universal formulation effect, emerged as the most consistent modulator. Because euthanasia efficacy and non-recovery were not experimental endpoints, these transcriptional data do not identify a best formulation for each developmental phase. These results support stage-aware reporting of euthanasia conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fishes
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes11070392
Primary Topic
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developmental Stage Shapes Acute Transcriptional Responses to Operational Chemical Euthanasia Formulations in Zebrafish Embryos and Larvae

Juan Balasch, Juan Ramos, Lluís Tort, Ali Reza Khansari
Fishes
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
article

Developmental Stage Shapes Acute Transcriptional Responses to Operational Chemical Euthanasia Formulations in Zebrafish Embryos and Larvae

Juan Balasch, Juan Ramos, Lluís Tort, Ali Reza Khansari
article en

Abstract

Chemical euthanasia protocols are routinely applied across zebrafish developmental stages, but the effects of formulation, time exposure, and developmental stage remain unclear and could introduce variability in transcriptional results and interfere with interlaboratory reproducibility of molecular endpoints. Wild-type AB zebrafish were exposed at three developmental windows (6 hpf, gastrulation; 30 hpf, pharyngula; 100 hpf, pre-feeding larva) to three operational euthanasia formulations (clove oil 0.1% v/v, tricaine/MS-222 1 g/L, or lidocaine 1 g/L), for 3, 10, or 25 min. Expression of ten genes covering immediate-early activation, cellular stress, metabolism, neuroendocrine signalling, apoptosis, and inflammation was quantified by qPCR. Expression responses were analysed using a three-way factorial framework including the developmental phase, formulation, and exposure time. The developmental phase explained substantial developmental context in several genes. The Phase × Treatment interaction was significant after global FDR correction for nine of ten genes, whereas treatment main effects did not provide a stable cross-stage ranking of formulations. Descriptively, gene expression varied across formulations and stages, with several Phase III markers showing positive shifts, but no operational formulation showed universally consistent effects after multiple-testing correction, while effect-size magnitudes should be interpreted cautiously. Acute transcriptional responses to operational chemical euthanasia formulations in zebrafish embryos and larvae were context-dependent. Developmental stage, rather than a universal formulation effect, emerged as the most consistent modulator. Because euthanasia efficacy and non-recovery were not experimental endpoints, these transcriptional data do not identify a best formulation for each developmental phase. These results support stage-aware reporting of euthanasia conditions.

FishesVol. 11(7)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.