Development and validation of the preparedness to disclose non-suicidal self-injury scale

Abstract The disclosure of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) can be a critical step in recovery by enabling access to social support, clinical intervention, and emotional validation. However, little is known about the psychological and contextual factors that shape individuals’ decisions to disclose NSSI. The present study developed and provided initial validation for the Preparedness to Disclose Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Scale (PDNS), a novel measure designed to assess individuals’ psychological readiness to disclose their experiences of NSSI. Seventy-five preliminary items were administered to 675 university students (77% female; M = 22.20 years, SD = 4.83), 64% of whom had previously disclosed their NSSI. Principal axis factoring revealed a three-factor structure (Self-Efficacy to Disclose, Interpersonal Motives, and Situational Readiness). The five highest loading items on each factor were retained, resulting in a 15-item scale that reliably differentiated individuals who had disclosed from those who had not. Evidence of measurement invariance across individuals who had or had not disclosed their NSSI supported the robustness and generalisability of the PDNS. Correlations with measures of theoretically related constructs provided support for the scale’s convergent and discriminant validity. These findings indicate that preparedness to disclose NSSI is a dynamic, multifaceted process shaped by social-cognitive factors. The PDNS provides a psychometrically sound tool for research and clinical practice, offering a framework to support safe and adaptive disclosure experiences among individuals who self-injure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Psychology
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-026-09723-0
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of the preparedness to disclose non-suicidal self-injury scale

Stephen P. Lewis, Kassandra Hon, Penelope Hasking, Mark Boyes
Current Psychology
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Development and validation of the preparedness to disclose non-suicidal self-injury scale

Stephen P. Lewis, Kassandra Hon, Penelope Hasking, Mark Boyes
article en

Abstract

Abstract The disclosure of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) can be a critical step in recovery by enabling access to social support, clinical intervention, and emotional validation. However, little is known about the psychological and contextual factors that shape individuals’ decisions to disclose NSSI. The present study developed and provided initial validation for the Preparedness to Disclose Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Scale (PDNS), a novel measure designed to assess individuals’ psychological readiness to disclose their experiences of NSSI. Seventy-five preliminary items were administered to 675 university students (77% female; M = 22.20 years, SD = 4.83), 64% of whom had previously disclosed their NSSI. Principal axis factoring revealed a three-factor structure (Self-Efficacy to Disclose, Interpersonal Motives, and Situational Readiness). The five highest loading items on each factor were retained, resulting in a 15-item scale that reliably differentiated individuals who had disclosed from those who had not. Evidence of measurement invariance across individuals who had or had not disclosed their NSSI supported the robustness and generalisability of the PDNS. Correlations with measures of theoretically related constructs provided support for the scale’s convergent and discriminant validity. These findings indicate that preparedness to disclose NSSI is a dynamic, multifaceted process shaped by social-cognitive factors. The PDNS provides a psychometrically sound tool for research and clinical practice, offering a framework to support safe and adaptive disclosure experiences among individuals who self-injure.

Current PsychologyVol. 45(13)
Curtin University (AU), University of Guelph (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.