Multi-modal Prehabilitation and Outcomes after Gastroesophageal Cancer Surgery: A Cohort Study of Pulmonary Complications and Resilience to Major Postoperative Events

BACKGROUND: Esophago-gastric cancer surgery frequently results in substantial morbidity. Prehabilitation, an approach to optimize an individual's preoperative physical, nutritional, and mental health, may decrease postoperative complications. Here, we present perioperative and allied health findings from a multimodal prehabilitation study (ACTRN12623000183684). METHODS: This single-center observational study recruited patients with esophago-gastric cancer undergoing curative-intent treatment between 2017 and 2024. Patients who did and did not receive multimodal prehabilitation were compared. Prehabilitation involved personalized medical, physical, nutritional, and psychological optimization before surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative respiratory complications. Secondary endpoints included other postoperative complications and allied health outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 164 participants (control n=121, prehabilitation n=43) underwent esophago-gastric cancer resection. More minimally invasive surgeries were performed in the prehabilitation group, but the baseline characteristics were otherwise similar between groups. Prehabilitation improved physical fitness and decreased malnutrition rates. Importantly, prehabilitation resulted in fewer postoperative respiratory (43.8% vs 20.9%, p=0.010), cardiac (22.3% vs 7.0%, p=0.037), hepatic (9.1% vs 0.0%, p=0.031), and renal (9.9% vs 0.0%, p=0.037) complications than in the control group. Moreover, prehabilitation was associated with diminished intensive care unit stays (median [IQR] 1 day [1.0-6.5] vs 1 day [1.0-3.0]; p=0.005) and hospital stays (14 days [9-24] vs 11 days [8-16]; p<0.001) and higher rates of adjuvant chemotherapy usage (51.0% vs 80.6%, p=0.004). Multivariate and sensitivity analyses demonstrated that prehabilitation, rather than surgical technique (laparoscopic vs open surgery), was independently associated with perioperative outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that multimodal prehabilitation improves perioperative outcomes for patients with esophago-gastric cancer, thus supporting routine integration of prehabilitation into perioperative care pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-026-19934-1
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-modal Prehabilitation and Outcomes after Gastroesophageal Cancer Surgery: A Cohort Study of Pulmonary Complications and Resilience to Major Postoperative Events

Ahmad Aly, Bianca Ukovic, Khang Duy Ricky Le, Benjamin Keong et al.
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Multi-modal Prehabilitation and Outcomes after Gastroesophageal Cancer Surgery: A Cohort Study of Pulmonary Complications and Resilience to Major Postoperative Events

Ahmad Aly, Bianca Ukovic, Khang Duy Ricky Le, Benjamin Keong, Ashley Bigaran, Ronald Ma, Katheryn Hall, Krinal Mori, Brooke Chapman, Carlene Wilson, on behalf of the Strong for Oesophago-gastric Cancer Surgery (SOCS) study group, Amanda Dalyell, Jesse Turner, Greta Ishak, Neha Suryanarayan, Liam Johnson, David S. Liu, Blake Binion, Jaimee Cacic, Darren Wong, Christie Mellerick, Linda Watson, Marissa Ferguson, Danny Brazzale, Laurence Weinberg, Celia Lanteri
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophago-gastric cancer surgery frequently results in substantial morbidity. Prehabilitation, an approach to optimize an individual's preoperative physical, nutritional, and mental health, may decrease postoperative complications. Here, we present perioperative and allied health findings from a multimodal prehabilitation study (ACTRN12623000183684). METHODS: This single-center observational study recruited patients with esophago-gastric cancer undergoing curative-intent treatment between 2017 and 2024. Patients who did and did not receive multimodal prehabilitation were compared. Prehabilitation involved personalized medical, physical, nutritional, and psychological optimization before surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative respiratory complications. Secondary endpoints included other postoperative complications and allied health outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 164 participants (control n=121, prehabilitation n=43) underwent esophago-gastric cancer resection. More minimally invasive surgeries were performed in the prehabilitation group, but the baseline characteristics were otherwise similar between groups. Prehabilitation improved physical fitness and decreased malnutrition rates. Importantly, prehabilitation resulted in fewer postoperative respiratory (43.8% vs 20.9%, p=0.010), cardiac (22.3% vs 7.0%, p=0.037), hepatic (9.1% vs 0.0%, p=0.031), and renal (9.9% vs 0.0%, p=0.037) complications than in the control group. Moreover, prehabilitation was associated with diminished intensive care unit stays (median [IQR] 1 day [1.0-6.5] vs 1 day [1.0-3.0]; p=0.005) and hospital stays (14 days [9-24] vs 11 days [8-16]; p<0.001) and higher rates of adjuvant chemotherapy usage (51.0% vs 80.6%, p=0.004). Multivariate and sensitivity analyses demonstrated that prehabilitation, rather than surgical technique (laparoscopic vs open surgery), was independently associated with perioperative outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that multimodal prehabilitation improves perioperative outcomes for patients with esophago-gastric cancer, thus supporting routine integration of prehabilitation into perioperative care pathways.

Annals of Surgical Oncology
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (US), Northern Hospital (AU), Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre (AU), Austin Health (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Austin Medical Research Foundation, University of Melbourne, Cancer Council Victoria
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.