Long-term clinical outcomes from the smart start trial: rituximab, lenalidomide and ibrutinib in patients with newly diagnosed large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma, in which ~60–85% of patients achieve a complete response (CR) with standard frontline chemoimmunotherapy approaches [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Despite these promising response rates, ~40% of patients can develop relapsed or refractory disease, and significant research efforts have been devoted to improving the durability and response with frontline therapies through the incorporation of novel agents [ 1 , 2 ]. Due to its biologic heterogeneity, DLBCL is subclassified by cell of origin (COO) into germinal center B-cell (GCB) and activated B-cell-like (ABC), the latter being considered in the “non-GCB” DLBCL group and heralding inferior outcomes with 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) as low as 40% [ 4 , 5 ]. However, non-GCB DLBCL harbors multiple targetable vulnerabilities, including chronic activation of B-cell transcription factors for differentiation (i.e. nuclear factor kB, IRF4) [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Harnessing these biological vulnerabilities, the Smart Start trial (NCT02636322) served as a proof-of-concept that a frontline non-cytotoxic RLI combination regimen utilizing rituximab with the immunomodulatory agent, lenalidomide, and Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, ibrutinib, results in excellent efficacy outcomes with a favorable safety profile [ 9 ]. After an initial lead-in phase with RLI targeted therapy for 2 cycles, 86% achieved an overall response rate (ORR), following which 95% of patients achieved a CR after receiving RLI-chemotherapy from cycles 3 to 8 [ 9 ]. Furthermore, with a median follow-up of 31 months, a 2-year PFS and overall survival (OS) of 91% and 97% were observed, respectively [ 9 ]. Herein, we now report the seven-year updated analysis of the safety and efficacy outcomes from the Smart Start trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Cancer Journal
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-026-01524-9
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term clinical outcomes from the smart start trial: rituximab, lenalidomide and ibrutinib in patients with newly diagnosed large B-cell lymphoma

Francisco Vega, Raphaël Steiner, Amrita Chauhan, Maria Alma Rodriguez et al.
Blood Cancer Journal
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Long-term clinical outcomes from the smart start trial: rituximab, lenalidomide and ibrutinib in patients with newly diagnosed large B-cell lymphoma

Francisco Vega, Raphaël Steiner, Amrita Chauhan, Maria Alma Rodriguez, Jason R. Westin, Paolo Strati, Jared Henderson, Sairah Ahmed, Dai Chihara, Karan L. Chohan, Michael Richard Green, R. Eric Davis, Sattva Swarup Neelapu, Fateeha Furqan, Eduardo Edelman Saul, Christopher R. Flowers, Preetesh Jain, Luis Malpica Castillo, Luis Fayad, Swaminathan P. Iyer, Chijioke Nze, Mark P. Hamilton, Anath C. Lionel, Fredrick Hagemeister, Ranjit Nair
article en

Abstract

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma, in which ~60–85% of patients achieve a complete response (CR) with standard frontline chemoimmunotherapy approaches [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Despite these promising response rates, ~40% of patients can develop relapsed or refractory disease, and significant research efforts have been devoted to improving the durability and response with frontline therapies through the incorporation of novel agents [ 1 , 2 ]. Due to its biologic heterogeneity, DLBCL is subclassified by cell of origin (COO) into germinal center B-cell (GCB) and activated B-cell-like (ABC), the latter being considered in the “non-GCB” DLBCL group and heralding inferior outcomes with 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) as low as 40% [ 4 , 5 ]. However, non-GCB DLBCL harbors multiple targetable vulnerabilities, including chronic activation of B-cell transcription factors for differentiation (i.e. nuclear factor kB, IRF4) [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Harnessing these biological vulnerabilities, the Smart Start trial (NCT02636322) served as a proof-of-concept that a frontline non-cytotoxic RLI combination regimen utilizing rituximab with the immunomodulatory agent, lenalidomide, and Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, ibrutinib, results in excellent efficacy outcomes with a favorable safety profile [ 9 ]. After an initial lead-in phase with RLI targeted therapy for 2 cycles, 86% achieved an overall response rate (ORR), following which 95% of patients achieved a CR after receiving RLI-chemotherapy from cycles 3 to 8 [ 9 ]. Furthermore, with a median follow-up of 31 months, a 2-year PFS and overall survival (OS) of 91% and 97% were observed, respectively [ 9 ]. Herein, we now report the seven-year updated analysis of the safety and efficacy outcomes from the Smart Start trial.

Blood Cancer JournalVol. 16(1)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Conquer Cancer Foundation, Celgene, National Institutes of Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.