The Impact of Decoding Ease on Lexical Quality of Word Representations in L2

When learning a new word, a robust lexical representation needs to be formed, including of its written (orthographic) form, spoken (phonological) form, and meaning (semantics), with strong associations between them. Previous research in monolingual, English-speaking adults suggests that the quality of these lexical representations may be affected by how easy words are to read (decode print-to-sound) during acquisition: Hulme et al. (2022) exposed monolingual, English-speaking adults to written pseudowords embedded in paragraphs. These pseudowords differed in how easy their spelling-sound mappings were to decode for monolingual L1-English speakers (e.g., easy: bamper; hard: uzide). Subsequently, the quality of participants’ orthographic, phonological, and semantic representations of the pseudowords were tested. Results showed that, as predicted, decoding ease impacted how well words were learned. In this study, we will investigate to what extent Hulme et al.’s (2022) findings can be observed in L2-English learners whose L1 (German) is more orthographically transparent than English.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Archives
Published
2026-07-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.22263
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Impact of Decoding Ease on Lexical Quality of Word Representations in L2

J.S.H. Taylor, Tanja C. Roembke, Rachael C. Hulme
Psychology Archives
Reading and Literacy Development
preprint

The Impact of Decoding Ease on Lexical Quality of Word Representations in L2

J.S.H. Taylor, Tanja C. Roembke, Rachael C. Hulme
preprint en

Abstract

When learning a new word, a robust lexical representation needs to be formed, including of its written (orthographic) form, spoken (phonological) form, and meaning (semantics), with strong associations between them. Previous research in monolingual, English-speaking adults suggests that the quality of these lexical representations may be affected by how easy words are to read (decode print-to-sound) during acquisition: Hulme et al. (2022) exposed monolingual, English-speaking adults to written pseudowords embedded in paragraphs. These pseudowords differed in how easy their spelling-sound mappings were to decode for monolingual L1-English speakers (e.g., easy: bamper; hard: uzide). Subsequently, the quality of participants’ orthographic, phonological, and semantic representations of the pseudowords were tested. Results showed that, as predicted, decoding ease impacted how well words were learned. In this study, we will investigate to what extent Hulme et al.’s (2022) findings can be observed in L2-English learners whose L1 (German) is more orthographically transparent than English.

Psychology Archives
Quality Education
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Impact of Decoding Ease on Lexical Quality of Word Representations in L2 — J.S.H. Taylor, Tanja C. Roembke, et al. · Psychology Archives (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS