Decolonising AI in Contemporary India: Pluriversal Feminist Critiques of Language Technologies and Women’s Safety in the Majority World Postdigital Age

Abstract In contemporary scholarly discourse, India’s rapidly expanding Artificial Intelligence (AI) ecosystem is portrayed as a catalyst for development, aligning with global narratives of technological optimism. In this paper, the discourse will be critically assessed through a feminist-decolonial lens, hypothesising that, without critical engagement, AI initiatives can reinforce historical power asymmetries and social biases. This paper further examines if AI-driven solutions in India have inadvertently marginalised the very communities they aim to empower by drawing from postcolonial theory, including Spivak’s concept of the subaltern, and feminist epistemology from Harding’s standpoint theory, with three case studies, namely, biometric welfare systems, AI applications for women’s safety, and language translation from rural and semi-urban contexts focusing on the challenges faced by marginalised women in navigating AI systems in India. The analysis of this research is informed by the Majority World perspective. It will synthesise insights to review the entanglement of technology with social context in the postdigital era, offering recommendations towards a more pluralistic and gender-just AI praxis for marginalised women. Ultimately, this paper advocates reimagining India’s AI future beyond dominant ‘development’ paradigms, with a focus on epistemic justice and inclusivity for underprivileged women. Across the three cases, I treat the postdigital not as a stage ‘after’ the digital but as an entangled condition in which systems attempt to code embodied markers of identity, i.e. fingerprints, faces/behaviour, and language, into computable gatekeeping devices, and where exclusions appear as everyday friction rather than isolated technical glitches.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Postdigital Science and Education
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-026-00674-0
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decolonising AI in Contemporary India: Pluriversal Feminist Critiques of Language Technologies and Women’s Safety in the Majority World Postdigital Age

Eisha Roy
Postdigital Science and Education
Digital Education and Society
article

Decolonising AI in Contemporary India: Pluriversal Feminist Critiques of Language Technologies and Women’s Safety in the Majority World Postdigital Age

Eisha Roy
article en

Abstract

Abstract In contemporary scholarly discourse, India’s rapidly expanding Artificial Intelligence (AI) ecosystem is portrayed as a catalyst for development, aligning with global narratives of technological optimism. In this paper, the discourse will be critically assessed through a feminist-decolonial lens, hypothesising that, without critical engagement, AI initiatives can reinforce historical power asymmetries and social biases. This paper further examines if AI-driven solutions in India have inadvertently marginalised the very communities they aim to empower by drawing from postcolonial theory, including Spivak’s concept of the subaltern, and feminist epistemology from Harding’s standpoint theory, with three case studies, namely, biometric welfare systems, AI applications for women’s safety, and language translation from rural and semi-urban contexts focusing on the challenges faced by marginalised women in navigating AI systems in India. The analysis of this research is informed by the Majority World perspective. It will synthesise insights to review the entanglement of technology with social context in the postdigital era, offering recommendations towards a more pluralistic and gender-just AI praxis for marginalised women. Ultimately, this paper advocates reimagining India’s AI future beyond dominant ‘development’ paradigms, with a focus on epistemic justice and inclusivity for underprivileged women. Across the three cases, I treat the postdigital not as a stage ‘after’ the digital but as an entangled condition in which systems attempt to code embodied markers of identity, i.e. fingerprints, faces/behaviour, and language, into computable gatekeeping devices, and where exclusions appear as everyday friction rather than isolated technical glitches.

Postdigital Science and Education
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decolonising AI in Contemporary India: Pluriversal Feminist Critiques of Language Technologies and Women’s Safety in the Majority World Postdigital Age — Eisha Roy · Postdigital Science and Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS