Spatial targeting and expansion prevention offer effective pathways to protect African maize from parasitic weeds

Parasitic weeds (Striga spp.) threaten food security for over 300 million Africans dependent on maize, yet economic impact estimates vary widely due to high uncertainties, limiting strategic planning and interventions. We developed a spatially-explicit framework overcoming data scarcity through integrated agroecological similarity mapping, machine learning, and stochastic modeling to quantify Striga economic impacts across African maize production systems. Our analysis resolves decades of uncertainty, revealing annual losses of US$1.04 billion (95% confidence interval: US$0.94–1.15 billion) with high spatial concentration: less than 6% of infested areas generate half the economic losses. Agricultural expansion represents the primary future risk, potentially tripling losses by 2050 as Striga colonizes new areas. Interventions achieve maximum impact through a dual strategy: spatial targeting of high-loss zones coupled with prevention in agricultural expansion areas. This targeted approach outperforms uniform intensification, providing a blueprint for managing agricultural pests in data-scarce regions. Parasitic weeds damage maize harvests across Africa, but their economic cost has been unclear. This study estimates about US$1 billion in annual losses, concentrated in hotspots; targeted control and spread prevention could help protect maize

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78614-6
Primary Topic
Plant Parasitism and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial targeting and expansion prevention offer effective pathways to protect African maize from parasitic weeds

Dan Makumbi, Mori W. Gouroubera, Takemore Chagomoka, Hugo De Groote et al.
Nature Communications
Plant Parasitism and Resistance
article

Spatial targeting and expansion prevention offer effective pathways to protect African maize from parasitic weeds

Dan Makumbi, Mori W. Gouroubera, Takemore Chagomoka, Hugo De Groote, Saliou Niassy, Franck B.N. Tonle, Henri Tonnang, Robert Zougmore, Alcade Segnon
article en

Abstract

Parasitic weeds (Striga spp.) threaten food security for over 300 million Africans dependent on maize, yet economic impact estimates vary widely due to high uncertainties, limiting strategic planning and interventions. We developed a spatially-explicit framework overcoming data scarcity through integrated agroecological similarity mapping, machine learning, and stochastic modeling to quantify Striga economic impacts across African maize production systems. Our analysis resolves decades of uncertainty, revealing annual losses of US$1.04 billion (95% confidence interval: US$0.94–1.15 billion) with high spatial concentration: less than 6% of infested areas generate half the economic losses. Agricultural expansion represents the primary future risk, potentially tripling losses by 2050 as Striga colonizes new areas. Interventions achieve maximum impact through a dual strategy: spatial targeting of high-loss zones coupled with prevention in agricultural expansion areas. This targeted approach outperforms uniform intensification, providing a blueprint for managing agricultural pests in data-scarce regions. Parasitic weeds damage maize harvests across Africa, but their economic cost has been unclear. This study estimates about US$1 billion in annual losses, concentrated in hotspots; targeted control and spread prevention could help protect maize

Nature Communications
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (KE), Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (KE), African Union (ET), International Center for Tropical Agriculture (KE), International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (KE), International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CO)
World Bank Group, Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Zero hunger, Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Plant Parasitism and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.