Agreement of Parent and Teacher Report on Executive Functioning Abilities of Preschool‐Aged Children Using the Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory

ABSTRACT Strong early executive functioning (EF) skills have been tied to successful academic and social outcomes. Behaviour rating tools have commonly been used, as they capture multiple stakeholder perspectives. The current study aims to explore parent–teacher agreement on the Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory (CHEXI) for preschool‐aged children in Australia. Secondary data analysis was performed on cross‐sectional survey data collected on 213 children (55.5% male; M age in months = 64, SD = 4.8) from 88 Early Childhood Education services in Victoria, Australia. The sample was slightly more disadvantaged than the national average ( M SEIFA = 989.20, SD = 56.35). Parent–teacher agreement was measured using correlational analysis. Paired Samples t ‐tests were conducted to identify parent–teacher rater differences on specific CHEXI domains. Parent–teacher agreement ranged from small to moderate across the four CHEXI domains ( r s = 0.27–0.37, p < 0.001). Parents tended to rate their children as higher in the regulation and inhibition subscales compared to teachers. No rater differences were found for the working memory and planning subscales. While respondent discrepancies are expected, this study offers novel insights into the patterns and potential reasons for parent–teacher disagreement, specifically on the CHEXI measure within an Australian preschool sample.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infant and Child Development
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.70117
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agreement of Parent and Teacher Report on Executive Functioning Abilities of Preschool‐Aged Children Using the Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory

Penny Levickis, Hannah Stark, Patricia Eadie, Maria Katerina Botin
Infant and Child Development
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Agreement of Parent and Teacher Report on Executive Functioning Abilities of Preschool‐Aged Children Using the Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory

Penny Levickis, Hannah Stark, Patricia Eadie, Maria Katerina Botin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Strong early executive functioning (EF) skills have been tied to successful academic and social outcomes. Behaviour rating tools have commonly been used, as they capture multiple stakeholder perspectives. The current study aims to explore parent–teacher agreement on the Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory (CHEXI) for preschool‐aged children in Australia. Secondary data analysis was performed on cross‐sectional survey data collected on 213 children (55.5% male; M age in months = 64, SD = 4.8) from 88 Early Childhood Education services in Victoria, Australia. The sample was slightly more disadvantaged than the national average ( M SEIFA = 989.20, SD = 56.35). Parent–teacher agreement was measured using correlational analysis. Paired Samples t ‐tests were conducted to identify parent–teacher rater differences on specific CHEXI domains. Parent–teacher agreement ranged from small to moderate across the four CHEXI domains ( r s = 0.27–0.37, p < 0.001). Parents tended to rate their children as higher in the regulation and inhibition subscales compared to teachers. No rater differences were found for the working memory and planning subscales. While respondent discrepancies are expected, this study offers novel insights into the patterns and potential reasons for parent–teacher disagreement, specifically on the CHEXI measure within an Australian preschool sample.

Infant and Child DevelopmentVol. 35(4)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.