What are the predominant factors predicting trend of post-traumatic growth for patients after bone tumour surgery? A longitudinal observational study

AIM: To investigate the predominant factors predicting trend of post-traumatic growth for patients after bone tumour surgery. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal observational study with convenience sampling. Follow-up examinations were conducted every two weeks over a total follow-up period of one month. Post-traumatic growth (PTG) levels were measured using the Chinese version of the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI-C). Latent Category Growth Model (LCGM) was applied to explore the latent trajectory categories of PTG. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore the predictors and influencing factors for patients with different trajectories. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were included in the study, and 141 patients completed the follow-up. The means of PTGI-C at different monitoring time were 41.24 ± 21.94, 44.56 ± 23.33, and 40.69 ± 22.63, respectively. Repeated measures analysis of variance with univariate revealed statistically significant differences in PTGI-C across different time (F = 3.372, P = 0.02). Patients were categorized into two latent subgroups: an increasing trend group (intercept = 44.276, slope = 5.152, P < 0.001) and a decreasing trend group (intercept = 35.164, slope = - 4.718, P < 0.001) based on two-category LCGM model. Low levels of post traumatic stress (vs. high levels) were associated with increased odds of decreasing PTG trajectory (OR 2.67, P = 0.015), indicating a risk factor. Unmarried status (vs. married) and giant cell tumour (OR = 0.223, P = 0.047), fibrogenic tumours (OR = 0.127, P = 0.007), cartilaginous origin tumour (OR = 0.194, P = 0.034), and other tumours (OR = 0.169, P = 0.023, vs. osteosarcoma) were protective factors. CONCLUSION: The classification of PTG change trajectory suggested different positive psychological processes in patients with bone tumours. Identifying the influencing factors of patients in the PTG decline trend group can guide nurses to provide effective intervention in time. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ChiCTR2300074170 (Registration Date: 1st August 2023).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-07-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05047-7
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What are the predominant factors predicting trend of post-traumatic growth for patients after bone tumour surgery? A longitudinal observational study

Peifang Li, J Z Chen, Ning Ning, Xiaofeng Zheng et al.
BMC Psychology
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

What are the predominant factors predicting trend of post-traumatic growth for patients after bone tumour surgery? A longitudinal observational study

Peifang Li, J Z Chen, Ning Ning, Xiaofeng Zheng, Yi-Xiang Wang, Ying Liu, Hong Duan, Chongqi Tu, Yitian Wang
article en

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the predominant factors predicting trend of post-traumatic growth for patients after bone tumour surgery. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal observational study with convenience sampling. Follow-up examinations were conducted every two weeks over a total follow-up period of one month. Post-traumatic growth (PTG) levels were measured using the Chinese version of the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI-C). Latent Category Growth Model (LCGM) was applied to explore the latent trajectory categories of PTG. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore the predictors and influencing factors for patients with different trajectories. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were included in the study, and 141 patients completed the follow-up. The means of PTGI-C at different monitoring time were 41.24 ± 21.94, 44.56 ± 23.33, and 40.69 ± 22.63, respectively. Repeated measures analysis of variance with univariate revealed statistically significant differences in PTGI-C across different time (F = 3.372, P = 0.02). Patients were categorized into two latent subgroups: an increasing trend group (intercept = 44.276, slope = 5.152, P < 0.001) and a decreasing trend group (intercept = 35.164, slope = - 4.718, P < 0.001) based on two-category LCGM model. Low levels of post traumatic stress (vs. high levels) were associated with increased odds of decreasing PTG trajectory (OR 2.67, P = 0.015), indicating a risk factor. Unmarried status (vs. married) and giant cell tumour (OR = 0.223, P = 0.047), fibrogenic tumours (OR = 0.127, P = 0.007), cartilaginous origin tumour (OR = 0.194, P = 0.034), and other tumours (OR = 0.169, P = 0.023, vs. osteosarcoma) were protective factors. CONCLUSION: The classification of PTG change trajectory suggested different positive psychological processes in patients with bone tumours. Identifying the influencing factors of patients in the PTG decline trend group can guide nurses to provide effective intervention in time. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: ChiCTR2300074170 (Registration Date: 1st August 2023).

BMC Psychology
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), King's College London (GB), Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), Sichuan Cancer Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.