Decomposition‐based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers

Abstract Background Quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) is widely applied in oncology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. However, its quantitative accuracy is often compromised by systematic variability arising from differences in scanners, acquisition protocols, and radiotracers, which limits the reliability of multicenter studies. Purpose To develop and validate PETHarmony, a novel voxel‐level harmonization framework for minimizing inter‐scanner and inter‐tracer variability. Methods PETHarmony utilizes a linear neural network to model covariates and singular value decomposition to isolate and remove variability in voxel space. Its performance was assessed in four scenarios: (i) using paired ‐FBB PET/CT and PET/MR scans ( N = 25, Huashan Hospital) to test the removal of scanner variability; (ii) using 20 repeated PET acquisitions of a NEMA NU‐2 IQ phantom to validate absolute quantitative accuracy; (iii) using paired ‐FBP and ‐PiB scans from GAAIN ( N = 46); and OASIS ( N = 84) to evaluate cross‐tracer consistency of cortical SUVR; and (iv) using unpaired multicenter data from ADNI ( N = 471; ‐FBP, ‐FTP, ‐FDG) to assess the impact on Alzheimer's disease (AD) classification. All harmonization procedures were conducted using leave‐one‐out cross‐validation or by training on unpaired data and applying the learned transformations to paired data. Results PETHarmony effectively eliminated voxel‐level discrepancies between PET/CT and PET/MR images ( reduced to n.s.). Phantom validation demonstrated that recovery coefficient curves were restored and closely aligned with the reference line, indicating improved quantitative accuracy. For cross‐tracer consistency, linear regression between ‐FBP and ‐PiB was markedly improved toward the line of identity ( y = x , R = 1). Specifically, in the GAAIN cohort, the regression line improved from y = 0.52 x + 0.52, = 0.89 to y = 0.93 x + 0.13, R = 0.97. In the OASIS cohort, it improved from y = 0.51 x + 0.55, = 0.87 to y = 0.95 x + 0.06, = 0.95. Furthermore, PETHarmony improved multicenter AD classification accuracy by 15.3% (‐FBP), 18.3% (‐FTP), and 21.7% (‐FDG). Conclusions PETHarmony achieves robust voxel‐level harmonization of multicenter PET data, significantly improving cross‐scanner and cross‐tracer consistency and enhancing diagnostic accuracy. It provides a practical solution for standardizing quantitative PET in multicenter oncology, neuroscience, and other clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Physics
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.70545
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decomposition‐based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers

Baoci Shan, Binbin Nie, T Zhang, Zuo Cy et al.
Medical Physics
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Decomposition‐based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers

Baoci Shan, Binbin Nie, T Zhang, Zuo Cy, G G Mao, Qi Huang, Ge Zhang, Shilun Zhao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) is widely applied in oncology, neuroscience, and clinical practice. However, its quantitative accuracy is often compromised by systematic variability arising from differences in scanners, acquisition protocols, and radiotracers, which limits the reliability of multicenter studies. Purpose To develop and validate PETHarmony, a novel voxel‐level harmonization framework for minimizing inter‐scanner and inter‐tracer variability. Methods PETHarmony utilizes a linear neural network to model covariates and singular value decomposition to isolate and remove variability in voxel space. Its performance was assessed in four scenarios: (i) using paired ‐FBB PET/CT and PET/MR scans ( N = 25, Huashan Hospital) to test the removal of scanner variability; (ii) using 20 repeated PET acquisitions of a NEMA NU‐2 IQ phantom to validate absolute quantitative accuracy; (iii) using paired ‐FBP and ‐PiB scans from GAAIN ( N = 46); and OASIS ( N = 84) to evaluate cross‐tracer consistency of cortical SUVR; and (iv) using unpaired multicenter data from ADNI ( N = 471; ‐FBP, ‐FTP, ‐FDG) to assess the impact on Alzheimer's disease (AD) classification. All harmonization procedures were conducted using leave‐one‐out cross‐validation or by training on unpaired data and applying the learned transformations to paired data. Results PETHarmony effectively eliminated voxel‐level discrepancies between PET/CT and PET/MR images ( reduced to n.s.). Phantom validation demonstrated that recovery coefficient curves were restored and closely aligned with the reference line, indicating improved quantitative accuracy. For cross‐tracer consistency, linear regression between ‐FBP and ‐PiB was markedly improved toward the line of identity ( y = x , R = 1). Specifically, in the GAAIN cohort, the regression line improved from y = 0.52 x + 0.52, = 0.89 to y = 0.93 x + 0.13, R = 0.97. In the OASIS cohort, it improved from y = 0.51 x + 0.55, = 0.87 to y = 0.95 x + 0.06, = 0.95. Furthermore, PETHarmony improved multicenter AD classification accuracy by 15.3% (‐FBP), 18.3% (‐FTP), and 21.7% (‐FDG). Conclusions PETHarmony achieves robust voxel‐level harmonization of multicenter PET data, significantly improving cross‐scanner and cross‐tracer consistency and enhancing diagnostic accuracy. It provides a practical solution for standardizing quantitative PET in multicenter oncology, neuroscience, and other clinical trials.

Medical PhysicsVol. 53(7)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of High Energy Physics (CN), Huashan Hospital (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.